Thursday, June 18, 2009

the time machine: resources for the teacher

Sites Relating to Wells and the Novel:

Text of the story:
http://www.literature.org/authors/wells-herbert-george/the-time-machine

Audio Versions of Wells' Classics:
http://members.aol.com/artcradio/sfbg.htm

Bibliography:
http://www.bath.ac.uk/~lisjpo/biblio.htm or http://members.tripod.com/~gwillick/biblio/HGWellsbib.html

The H.G. Wells Society Website:
http://www.rdg.ac.uk/~lhsjamse/wells/wells.htm

The Wellsian, the Official Newsletter of the H.G. Wells Society:
http://www.rdg.ac.uk/~lhsjamse/wells/wellsian.htm

More On-line complete works:
http://www.literature.org/authors/wells-herbert-george/

Essay Comparing the novel and the film:
http://www.cswnet.com/~dbruce/other/time.html

Brief biography done by what looks like a student:
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Delphi/8169/index.htm

A&E Website to order the video on H.G. Wells:
http://www.schoolroom.com/videos/v13531.htm

Brief Essay on Wells' vision including references to The Time Machine:
http://www.crystalinks.com/wells.html

The H.G. Wells Resource Site including a biography,:
http://www.bath.ac.uk/~lisjpo/wellsian.html

Filmography:
http://us.imdb.com/Name?Wells,+H.G.

Information about Wells and Copyright:
http://www.rdg.ac.uk/~lhsjamse/wells/hgwcopy.htm

H.G. Wells Discussion Group:
http://www.rdg.ac.uk/~lhsjamse/wells/hgwcopy.htm

A study guide for War of the Worlds:
http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~brians/science_fiction/warofworlds.html

Real Audio version of The War of the Worlds radio play:
http://earthstation1.simplenet.com/wotw.html

Time Machine Graphics:
http://www.snowcrest.net/fox/time.html

A Web Site About the 1960 Movie:
http://www-scf.usc.edu/~pike/time.html

Sites Relating to Science Fiction or Time Travel in General:

A Science Fiction research biography. A good listing of sources on Science Fiction:
http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~brians/science_fiction/sfresearch.html

The Ultimate Science Fiction Web Guide (a truly HUGE collection of information and links):
http://www.magicdragon.com

Timeline of Science Fiction:
http://www.magicdragon.com/UltimateSF/timeline.html

The Time Ships: information about Stephen Baxter's modern sequel to The Time Machine:
http://www.sam.math.ethz.ch/%7Epkeller/BAXTER/TSPage.html

The Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America (SFWA):
http://www.sfwa.org

Contact the SFWA Speaker Bureau at:
Kathleen Woodbury

The Horror Writers Association:
http://www.horror.org

The Science Fiction Resource Guide:
http://www.sflovers.edu/SFRG

The SF Site: a Bi-Monthly Look at Current Science Fiction in Print:
http://www.sfsite.com

Locus Online: the online version of the professional science fiction writer's newspaper:
http://www.locusmag.com

Interactive Time Machine history quiz (not related to the book). Fun for the History teacher and students:
http://www.whatrain.com/quiz/

A Fun Site that takes time travel seriously. Check out the links on the Time Travel Web Ring at the bottom of their page:
http://www.out-a-time.com/

Writing:

Teenfinity, Fruita Monument High School's webzine of student science fiction written in response to the story assignment on this web site.
http://www.sff.net/people/james.van.pelt/teenfinity/index.htm

Inkspot for Young Writers. The place to start for the high school writer interested in going on. Links, articles and places to publish their work.
http://www.inkspot.com/young/

The Market List: an online listing of magazines that publish science fiction/fantasy and horror. Includes publishing needs, pay rates and editorial addresses:
http://www.marketlist.com

The SFWA Collection of Articles on Writing Science Fiction:
http://www.sfwa.org/writing/writing.htm

Mary Soon Lee's Speculative Fiction Page:
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~mslee/wr.html

Robert Sawyer's Essays on Writing Science Fiction:
http://www.sfwriter.com/owindex.htm

For Writers Only (numerous resources and links):
http://www.webwitch.com/writers/

SF Author Jeffrey A. Carver's Advice to Aspiring Writers:
http://www.starrigger.net/advice.htp

SF Author Julie Czerneda's List of Recommended SF web sites:
http://www.czerneda.com/nlsites.htm

Orson Scott Card's Home Page (check out his writing lessons):
http://www.hatrack.com/

Speculations: the Magazine for Writers Who Want to be Read:
http://www.speculations.com

Internet Resources for Science Fiction Authors (an outstanding article with numerous links to source material for SF writers--there's no reason to get the science wrong!):
http://www.writerswrite.com/journal/jan99/gak11.htm

Curriculum On Line:

Ask Jeeves search on "Where do I find out about teaching literature?"

Creative Writing for Teens:
http://teenwriting.about.com/teens/teenwriting/msub90.htm

Science Fiction: a Resource Page for Teachers and Students (a wonderful site with suggestions on teaching a variety of science fiction ideas)
http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/~tslucht/sf-basics.html

Literature Teaching Resources (a very useful site):
http://www.tyler.net/ruskhslib/literary.htm

Outta Ray's Head: Lesson Plans:
http://www3.sympatico.ca/ray.saitz/lessons3.htm

Voice of the Shuttle English Literature Main Page: HUGE collection of literature curriculum:
http://vosucsb.edu/shuttle/english.html

Voice of the Shuttle English Literature Science, Technology and Culture Page:
http://vosucsb.edu/shuttle/science.html#scifi

The Yale-New Haven Teachers Institute: Science Fiction and the Future. A description of a seventh grade Talented and Gifted student unit on science fiction. Contains an interesting justification for teaching science fiction and includes lesson plans for teaching several short stories.
http://www.cis.yale.edu/ynhti/curriculum/units/1987/2/87.02.04.x.html

the time machine: the end of man

As many critics have observed, H.G. Wells was preoccupied very early with speculations on evolution, in particular the evolution of Man and the prospects of intelligent life, whatever its origins. The Time Machine (1895), The War of the Worlds (1898), and The First Men in the Moon (1901) are the best known examples of his interest in such matters, but certain of his shorter works also reflect this concern. Frequently, Wells would recapitulate and refine his major ideas, mining old essays for new story material or refashioning the elements of one tale in the context of another; various scholars have explored the interpenetration of these works in some detail.

In "The Man of the Year Million" (essay, 1893)1 and The War of the Worlds, Wells outlined one model for the ultimate evolution of humankind. In both works, the culmination of higher intelligence is a globular entity, brought about by the influence of steadily advancing technology. In each case, it mainly consists of a great, bald head, supported on large hands or equivalent appendages, with thorax vestigial or entirely absent. The Martian is a direct analogue of the Man of the Year Million, as Wells himself indicated by citing his own essay in the body of the novel (§2:2).2 The Selenite master-race of First Men is a kindred expression of this vision of enlarged intellect—especially the Grand Lunar, with its enormous cranium, diminutive face, and shriveled body. Of more special relevance to the Martians are the malignant cephalopods of "The Sea Raiders" (1896) and "The Extinction of Man" (essay, 1894), and as well the predatory specimen in "The Flowering of the Strange Orchid" (1894).

At least one scholar has referred to "The Man of the Year Million" as "another version" of The Time Machine, apparently because the domeheads take refuge underground from the increasing rigors of a cooling surface.3 This connection is rather tenuous, at best; by such criteria, First Men also might be deemed a variant of The Time Machine. In fact, the Further Vision of the latter constitutes a curious inversion of the above essay, but scholars and critics have failed to perceive this relation. Their failure depends on a more primary error, which is this—the notion that Man is extinct at the climax of the novel.

That the progeny of Man is not absent from the final moments of the Further Vision should be evident from a passage that appeared (until recently) only in the serial version. This deleted episode is a philosophic bridge, a key to what happens at world’s end. It introduces the successors of Eloi and Morlock: a hopping, kangaroo-like semblance of humanity and a monstrous, shambling centipede. According to Robert Philmus, "these two species must have descended in the course of time from the Eloi and the Morlocks; and again the ‘grey animal, or grey man, whichever it was’ is the victim of the carnivorous giant insects."4

Philmus accentuates the elements of degeneration and regression in Wells’s Darwinian conjectures; thus he asserts that The Time Machine embodies a vision of the hominid line "irrevocably on the downward path of devolution."5 The general validity of this viewpoint cannot be disputed; nevertheless, the extreme construction he places upon it leads him considerably astray. Though Wells used terms like "retrogression," "degradation," and "degeneration" in his essays, they were for him relative terms only. He would hardly have portrayed Man as reverting literally into so primitive a creature; such "devolution," I submit, is not in the Wellsian mode.

Philmus may have been encouraged in this faulty genealogy by the Traveler’s observations of the Elysian world of the Eloi, which seems devoid of animal life, excepting a few sparrows and butterflies (§4b/288; §5a/292).6 Of course, this stricture need not apply to the murky lower world, which could easily harbor all sorts of vermin. If butterflies prosper above, in a world of flowers, then centipedes should thrive below, in a realm of meaty table scraps and other waste. And at journey’s end, "a thing like a huge white butterfly" makes a brief display, as a demonstration of what has survived the English sparrow (§11/328).

The Morlocks of Millenium #803, moreover, are not a race destined for perpetual dominance. This much is made clear by numerous facets of their existence—their lack of light, the disrepair of much of their machinery, their crude and inefficient method of harvesting Eloi. Although the Time Traveler refers to the Eloi as "cattle" and supposes that they may even be bred by the Morlocks (§7/311), the rest of the book does not show the latter practicing much in the way of husbandry. Indeed the absence of other land animals in the lush upper world may well be the result of earlier predations by the Morlocks. So the best assumption is that the relationship between the two races is unstable—that the Morlocks are depleting their latest dietary resource, which must eventually go the way of its predecessors.

The kangaroo-beast, therefore, can only be a tribe descended from the Morlocks, now scavenging the surface in the long twilight. The irony of the new situation is evident, and quite typical of the many ironic aspects of the novel: the hound is now the hare, the erstwhile predator has become the current prey.

The ancestry of this pathetic creature is confirmed by its morphology. Consider the appearance of the Morlock: "a queer little ape-like figure," "dull white," with "flaxen hair on its head and down its back" (§5b/299), and a "chinless" face, with "great, lidless, pinkish-grey eyes" (§6/306). Compare that with the Traveler’s description of the later species: "It was ... covered with a straight greyish hair that thickened about the head into a Skye terrier’s mane.... It had, moreover, a rounded head, with a projecting forehead and forward-looking eyes, obscured by its lank hair" (325). The ape-like brow-ridge is a tell-tale vestige of the Morlocks, as well as the lank hair that now shields the creature’s eyes. The shaggy visage identifies the kangaroo-man as a once-nocturnal animal only recently emerged from darkness. Another indicative trait is its rabbit-like feet, which are compatible with the "queer narrow footprints" of the Morlocks (§5a/292).

From a close inspection the Traveler surmises, the nature of the beast: "A disagreeable apprehension flashed across my mind.... I knelt down and seized my capture, intending to examine its teeth and other anatomical points which might show human characteristics..." (326). He might also be looking for the signs of yesterday’s carnivore.

This Morlock offspring is no longer extant in the climactic scene of the Further Vision, but it is not the Last Man observed by the Traveler. He arrives in the era of the giant land-crabs, then passes on to the time of the great eclipse, where nothing seems to stir—at first:

I looked about me to see if any traces of animal life remained.... But I saw nothing moving, in earth or sky or sea. The green slime alone testified that life was not extinct.... I fancied I saw some black object flopping about...but it became motionless as I looked at it, and I judged that my eye had been deceived, and that the black object was merely a rock.
A nearby planet encroaches on the bloated sun; the eclipse progresses, becomes total, and then the shadow of heaven recedes:

I shivered, and a deadly nausea seized me.... I felt giddy and incapable of facing the return journey. As I stood sick and confused I saw again the moving thing upon the shoal.... It was a round thing, the size of a football perhaps...and tentacles trailed down from it; it seemed black against the weltering blood-red water, and it was hopping fitfully about. Then I felt I was fainting. But a terrible dread of lying helpless in that remote and awful twilight sustained me while I clambered into the saddle. (§11/329-30)
The kangaroo-men hop about on elongated feet; the men of the year million hop about on great soft hands; the thing on the shoal hops about on a trailing mass of tentacles. This similarity in modes of locomotion is hardly a literary accident. In contrast, the Sea-Raiders never hop, but creep along at a steady pace when traversing solid ground.

In general form the Last Creature resembles a large cephalopod. Is it a primitive survivor from the ocean deeps, like Haploteuthis in "The Sea Raiders," or is it a being like the Martians, the hypertrophic end-product of intelligent life? Most of the evidence points to the latter—a highly specialized and atrophied edition of genus Homo. Note particularly the size of the creature; it is about "the size of a football"—which is to say, about the size of a human head.

The Time Traveler contracts a "terrible dread of lying helpless" in the dying world soon after he becomes fully aware of the thing on the shoal. There seems to be a special revulsion attached to this monster, even though it can hardly pose a real threat to the Traveler. Before it commands his attention, he feels "incapable of facing the return journey"; afterward, the "dread of lying helpless" in its presence impels him to turn back forthwith. Consciously, the Traveler does not perceive the human ancestry of this apocalyptic organism, but apparently the unconscious realization of its true nature makes him flee the final wasteland. Not the oppressive conditions, nor the extinction of Man, nor even the approaching oblivion triggers his retreat; rather, he recoils from the knowledge, however submerged, of what Man has become.

And what has Man become? Certainly not the inflated intellect of a Martian, nor that of a Sea-Raider, despite the somatic affinities. In one important respect, the Last Man differs greatly from these other fantastic creations: it is a being without a face. Even Haploteuthis has a definite, mock-human visage—"a grotesque suggestion of a face." To be sure, the super-minds in the Wellsian canon—the million-year domeheads, the Martians, the Grand Lunar—all suffer from facial attrition, yet certain features, especially the eyes, always remain. Not so with the fitful creature on the beach; the swollen surface of its body seems utterly blank, devoid of perceptual apparatus, and its aimless, reflexive actions indicate that it is virtually mindless. In the end, then, Man has become little more than a giant polyp.

All these transmuted beings emphasize two primary functions of life: ingestion and cerebration. The intelligent Sea-Raiders, for example, come to earth in search of a better feed. Both the Martians and the domeheads have actually surrendered their alimentary canals to cortical advances, and the Martians, like the man-eating squids, also come to Earth for new sustenance. The mindless tropism of the Strange Orchid impels it to siphon off human blood, whereas the Martians strive for the same end with a ruthless deliberation.

The ultimate survivor of The Time Machine is not a great brain; as with a polyp, therefore, all that is left is a great ravening stomach. (For this, too, its size is appropriate.) Here, in counterpoint to the Martian terror, is the Wellsian image of ultimate horror.

And so we confront a symbolic paradox: the same emblem represents both the zenith and the nadir of mentality; the opposition of head and stomach, of mind and body, is fused in this one corporeal form. In Wells’s iconography, it stands for the ultimate degeneration, whether of body or mind. He disapproved less, we may suppose, of the absolute intellect, reserving his greatest dread for the other, the mindless all-devouring. Yet there can be little doubt that, despite sardonic ambiguities, as in "The Man of the Year Million" and The First Men in the Moon, he truly preferred neither; his best wish was that Man should master himself without ever losing the essence of humanity. To this end Wells devoted most of his long and active life, even unto Mind at the End of Its Tether (1945), where a faint hope still lingers that some ultra-human entity will arise to survive the impending decline of Homo sapiens. This was Wells’s last desperate hope, and a very feeble one it was; nevertheless, near the end of his life, amid sickness and depression, that glimmer remained. As the nameless narrator of The Time Machine insists, when faced with the inevitable disintegration of Man: "If that is so, it remains for us to live as though it were not so" (Epilogue/335).

NOTES

1. First published in The Pall Mall Gazette, Nov 9, 1893, this essay, with title changed to "Of a Book Unwritten," appears in Certain Personal Matters (UK 1897), as does the other essay mentioned in this paragraph, "The Extinction of Man."

2. Another avatar appears in "The Plattner Story," against a setting remarkably suggestive of the Further Vision. Plattner, who is blown through a fourth spatial dimension, finds himself on a barren landscape of dark red shadows, backed by a green sky-glow. He watches the rise of a giant green sun, which reveals a deep cleft nearby. A multitude of bulbous creatures float upward, like so many bubbles, from this chasm. These are the "Watchers of the Living," literally the souls of the dead: "they were indeed limbless; and they had the appearance of human heads beneath which a tadpole-like body swung" (para. 26). Significantly, Wells had referred to his Men of the Year Million as "human tadpoles."

In many respects, this realm of the afterlife is a striking reversal of The Time Machine’s terminal wasteland, yet quite recognizably akin to it.

3. Gordon S. Haight, "H.G. Welles ‘The Man of the Year Million’," Nineteenth-Century Fiction 12(1958):323-26.

4. Robert M. Philmus, Into the Unknown (US 1970), pp 70-71.

5. Ibid., p. 75.

6. §7/311 = Chapter 7 in the standard form of the text (i.e., as published in the Atlantic Edition, the Complete Short Stories, and almost all editions since 1924), or Page 311 of Three Prophetic Novels of H.G. Wells (Dover Publications, 1960). The chapterings of the standard and Dover forms (with "a" and "b" added for convenience) collate as follows: la = 1; lb = 2; 2 = 3; 3 = 4; 4a = 5; 4b = 6; 5a = 7; 5b = 8; 6 = 9; 7 = 10; 8 = 11; 9 = 12; 10 = 13; 11 = 14; 12a = 15; 12b = 16; Epilogue = Epilogue. The deleted passage, pages 325-27 of the Dover text, would appear between the first and second paragraphs of Chapter 11 in the standard text.



ABSTRACT

The Time Machine (1895), The War of the Worlds (1898), and The First Men in the Moon (1901) are the best-known examples of Wells’s speculations on evolution, but some of his shorter works also reflect this concern. Robert Philmus has referred to "The Man of the Year Million" (essay, 1893) as "another version" of The Time Machine; and analogous to the Martians in War of the Worlds are the malignant cephalopods of "The Sea Raiders" (1896) and "The Extinction of Man" (essay, 1894), as well as the predatory specimen described in "The Flowering of the Strange Orchid" (1894). Wells’s vision of evolution was often expressed via a paradoxical emphasis on two primary functions of life: ingestion and cerebration. The ultimate survivor of The Time Machine is not a great brain but a ravening stomach—the Wellsian image of ultimate horror. Wells disapproved less, we may suppose, of the absolute intellect, reserving his greatest dread for the other, the mindless all-devouring. Yet there can be little doubt that he truly preferred neither, hoping (however faintly) for an ultimate balance between body and mind: his best wish was that human beings should master themselves without losing the essence of humanity. That evolution seemed unlikely to produce any such result led to his preoccupation late in his life with the idea that some ultra-human entity might arise from the impending decline of Homo sapiens.

[Original text here]

the time machine: controversy

The Time Traveler’s careless decision to travel so extremely far into the future caused negative consequences.

One example of how excessive time travel shows carelessness is the uncertainty of where the Time Traveler will land, when he arrives in the future. Even the Time Traveler express fear that when he comes to a stop he may crash into some object, causing a huge explosion. The Time Traveler may also end up in an ocean, and sink to his death. Another example of this is that the Time Traveler does not know anything about the future species. There may be bacteria and diseases in the future that are unknown to his time period. There is also uncertainty about how the future beings will react towards him. They may have shown him hostility rather than generosity.

One scenario that expresses the carelessness of the decision is that, the Time Traveler might get stuck in the future and will never be able to return home. When his machine mysteriously goes missing the Time traveler has no means of going back to his time. Having enough trust in the future beings, that he just met, to leave his machine alone for a whole day shows carelessness.

A last example of how time traveling really far into the future was a bad idea is when the Time Traveler almost gets captured by the Morlocks. First of all, he does not know what these creatures are capable of and what they might do. Next, he runs out of matches, which is the only way to keep the Morlocks away. This shows that he is not prepared to go against the creatures. If the Morlocks had caught him he may have experienced fatal consequences.

[Original text here]

the time machine: theme and global connection

A part of human nature that is shown in the novel is the social gap between the rich part of society, and the poor laboring part of society.

The gap is exposed between the society of the peaceful, human-like Eloi and the laboring and slave-like society of the Morlocks. This shows that there will always be some kind of social gap between the rich, or in this case the Eloi, and the poor laborers, or Morlocks. This gap is also relevant in modern times, and throughout history, and is especially relevant to the time period in which the novel was written.

The difference between the two societies is also shown by how diverse each species lives are. For example, The Eloi only venture outside during the day, whereas the Morlocks only come out when it is dark. Both creatures also live in their own completely unique environments. The Eloi live in buildings above ground, while the Morlocks live in deep, dark underground tunnels, and neither society has any connection with the other.

A last representation of this social gap is the violence of the Morlocks towards the Eloi. After many years of serving as slaves for the Eloi, the Morlocks have grown bitter, and violent. The violence is confirmed by the smell of meat in the tunnels where the Morlocks live. It is assumed that this meat is dead Eloi. This violence has caused the Eloi to become scared of the Morlocks, which is also why the Eloi always stay together.

When the Time Traveler says “So as I see it, the Upper-world man had drifted towards his feeble prettiness, and the Under-world to mere mechanical industry…” (Pg. 67) Or in other words as time goes on these two societies drift apart, and it is in the Eloi nature to be pampered and live perfect lives, whereas the Morlocks must live lives as slaves, and eventually hunters.

[Original text here]

the time machine: future of humanity

As portrayed in the short story The Time Machine by H.G. Wells, the future of humanity is corrupted by the wide and unjust division of the upper and lower classes of society.

John M. Richardson, Jr. once said, “When it comes to the future, there are three kinds of people: those who let it happen, those who make it happen, and those who wonder what happened” In the short story “The Time Machine” by H.G. Wells, we see what the future could be like if we as humans do not change our capitalistic way of life. Wells’ main character, the Time Traveler, discovers that humanity evolves differently physically, socially, and intellectually into the Eloi and the Morlock because of the wide and unjust division between the upper and lower classes of society.

The division between the upper and lower classes of society lead the Eloi and the Morlock to develop differently physically. This can be seen when the Time Traveler comments on the Eloi’s distinctive looks, “Their hair, which was uniformly curly, came to a sharp end at the neck and cheek…” (Wells 245). This observation shows that the Capitalists, or upper class, have evolved into curly haired humans. On the contrary, the Time Traveler describes the Morlocks, “…I saw a solitary white, ape-like creature running rather quickly…” (Wells 267). This description shows that the Labourers, or lower class, have evolved in to fast white apes far superior to the Eloi. The assumption can be made that due to the upper and lower class division, the Morlock have evolved into a separate species from the Eloi and dominate them. Thus, the separation of the classes changed the human species.

Socially, the Eloi and the Morlock develop differently due to the division between the upper and lower classes. This can be seen when the Time Traveler descirbes Weena, an Eloi, “[Weena] was exactly like a child.” (Wells 266). This observation shows how the Eloi do not understand basic human concepts above a child’s level of understanding. The Time Traveler then goes on to relate the social differences to the division of the classes, “…social difference between the Capitalist and the Labourer was the key to the whole position.” (Wells 272). This remark shows that the Time Traveler understands why and how the human race developed into two separate species. The Time Traveler was clearly a smart man.

The Eloi and the Morlock develop differently intellectually because of the upper and lower class division. This is seen when the Time Traveler remarks on Weena’s character, “But [Weena] dreaded the dark, dreaded shadows, dreaded black things.” (Wells 266). This comment shows that Weena, and all Elois, fear the dark, but do not have the intellect to understand why they fear it. What Wells is trying to say is that the Eloi are stupid, plain and simple. The Time Traveler goes on to comment on the Morlocks mating habits, “The male pursued the female, flinging flowers at her as she ran.” (Wells 271). This depiction of the Morlock shows that they are much smarter than the Elois because they know how to get a girl. Clearly, the Morlock are far superior in all aspects of superiority.

To conclude, through the characterization of the Elois and the Morlocks, one can assume that they have evolved differently physically, socially, and intellectually because of the division of the classes. Thankfully, this would never really happen in only eight hundred thousand years.

[Original text here]

the time machine: origins and sources


THE TIME MACHINE was H. G. Wells' first work of any literary importance. Within the brief years of 1895-98, Wells wrote: THE TIME MACHINE, THE ISLAND OF DR. MOREAU, AND THE WAR OF THE WORLDS. Not a bad record for a man of twenty-nine through thirty- two!

Wells got the germ of an idea about time travel from the students' debating society at Imperial College, London. He says,

"I heard about and laid hold of the idea of a four dimensional frame for a fresh apprehension of physical phenomena, which afterwards led me to send a paper, 'The Universe Rigid,' to THE FORTNIGHTLY REVIEW (a paper which was rejected by Frank Harris as 'incomprehensible'), and gave me a frame for my first scientific fantasia. THE TIME MACHINE. . . .If there was a Universe rigid, and hitherto uniform, the character of the consequent world would depend entirely, I argued along strictly materialist lines, upon the velocity of this initial displacement. The disturbance would spread outward with ever-increasing complication. But I discovered no way, and there was no one to show me a way to get to get on from such elementary struggles with primary concepts, to a sound understanding of contemporary experimental physics."

-- EXPERIMENT IN BIOGRAPHY, p. 172.

Wells and his soon-to-be second wife were living in rented rooms in a semi-detached house at 23, Eardley Road. The landlady disapproved of these arrangements and made loud comments to the neighbors outside Wells' window. Some critics have found evidences of this landlady in the character of the Morlocks. Wells recalls writing a turning point in THE TIME MACHINE with the landlady's voice droning outside:

"I still remember writing that part of the story in which the Time Traveller returns to find his machine removed and his retreat cut off. I sat alone at the round table downstairs writing steadily in the luminous circle cast by a shaded paraffin lamp. Jane had gone to bed and her mother had been ill in bed all day. It was a very warm blue August night and the window was wide open. The best part of my mind fled through the story in a state of concentration before the Morlocks but some outlying regions were recording other things. Moths were fluttering in ever and again and though I was unconscious of them at the time, one must have flopped near me and left some trace in my marginal consciousness that became a short story I presently wrote, " A Moth Genus Novo." And outside in the summer night a voice went on and on, a feminine voice that rose and fell. . .I was aware of her and heeded her not, and she lacked the courage to beard me in my parlour. "Would I never go to bed? How could she lock up with that window staring open? Never had she had such people in her house before, -- never. A nice lot if everything was known about them. . .What she let her rooms to was summer visitors who walked about all day and went to bed at night. And she hated meanness and there were some who could be mean about sixpences. People with lodgings to let in Sevenoaks ought to know the sort of people who might take them. . ."

"It went on and on. I wrote on grimly to that accompaniment. I wrote her out and she made her last comment with the front door well and truly slammed. I finished my chapter before I shut the window and turned down the lamp. And somehow amidst the gathering disturbance of those days THE TIME MACHINE got itself finished."

-- EXPERIMENT IN AUTOBIOGRAPHY, pp. 436-37.

The origin of THE TIME MACHINE came in a commission to Wells from the famous editor W. E. Henley, who had already published some tales by Wells in THE NATIONAL OBSERVER. Even the time traveller articles were not original. Wells derived them from a series called 'The Chronic Argonauts,' which he wrote for THE SCHOOLS JOURNAL.

Henley was about to start publishing a journal called THE NEW REVIEW, and he gave Wells the idea that he should re-work the time traveller material into a novel.

REFERENCE:
Wells, H. G. EXPERIMENT IN AUTOBIOGRAPHY. New York: MacMillan, 1934.

the time machine: synopsis


Context

Herbert George Wells was born in 1866 in London. He attended Bromley Academy, a private day school. After attending the Normal School of Science in South Kensington, he became a science teacher. At the Normal School, he studied under Thomas Henry Huxley, a famous advocate of the scientific theory of evolution.

Several early versions of The Time Machine were published in the early 1890s, but the completed novella did not appear until 1895, when Wells was 34 years old. It was the first tale of time travel, and it is considered one of the forerunners of the science fiction genre.

The Time Machine's literary influences are numerous. Most obvious is Jonathan Swift's Gulliver's Travels, written a century earlier. The Time Machine is a fusion of tales from fantastic lands, commentary on current British social questions, and an introduction to cutting-edge scientific theories.

Wells went on to publish more works of science fiction, including The Island of Doctor Moreau (1896), The Invisible Man (1897), and The War of the Worlds (1898). He also published comic works of fiction such as The History of Mr. Polly (1910) and An Outline of History (1920).

Summary

A group of men, including the narrator, is listening to the Time Traveller discuss his theory that time is the fourth dimension. The Time Traveller produces a miniature time machine and makes it disappear into thin air. The next week, the guests return, to find their host stumble in, looking disheveled and tired. They sit down after dinner, and the Time Traveller begins his story.

The Time Traveller had finally finished work on his time machine, and it rocketed him into the future. When the machine stops, in the year 802,701 AD, he finds himself in a paradisiacal world of small humanoid creatures called Eloi. They are frail and peaceful, and give him fruit to eat. He explores the area, but when he returns he finds that his time machine is gone. He decides that it has been put inside the pedestal of a nearby statue. He tries to pry it open but cannot. In the night, he begins to catch glimpses of strange white ape-like creatures the Eloi call Morlocks. He decides that the Morlocks live below ground, down the wells that dot the landscape. Meanwhile, he saves one of the Eloi from drowning, and she befriends him. Her name is Weena. The Time Traveller finally works up enough courage to go down into the world of Morlocks to try to retrieve his time machine. He finds that matches are a good defense against the Morlocks, but ultimately they chase him out of their realm. Frightened by the Morlocks, he takes Weena to try to find a place where they will be safe from the Morlocks' nocturnal hunting. He goes to what he calls the Palace of Green Porcelain, which turns out to be a museum. There, he finds more matches, some camphor, and a lever he can use as a weapon. That night, retreating from the Morlocks through a giant wood, he accidentally starts a fire. Many Morlocks die in the fire and the battle that ensues, and Weena is killed. The exhausted Time Traveller returns to the pedestal to find that it has already been pried open. He strides in confidently, and just when the Morlocks think that they have trapped him, he springs onto the machine and whizzes into the future.

The Time Traveller makes several more stops. In a distant time he stops on a beach where he is attacked by giant crabs. The bloated red sun sits motionless in the sky. He then travels thirty million years into the future. The air is very thin, and the only sign of life is a black blob with tentacles. He sees a planet eclipse the sun. He then returns, exhausted, to the present time. The next day, he leaves again, but never returns.

Characters

The Time Traveller - The Time Traveller's name is never given. Apparently the narrator wants to protect his identity. The Time Traveller is an inventor. He likes to speculate on the future and the underlying structures of what he observes. His house is in Richmond, a suburb of London.

The Narrator - The narrator, Mr. Hillyer, is the Time Traveller's dinner guest. His curiosity is enough to make him return to investigate the morning after the first time travel.

Weena - Weena is one of the Eloi. Although the Time Traveller reports that it is difficult to distinguish gender among the Eloi, he seems quite sure that Weena is female. He easily saves her from being washed down the river, and she eagerly becomes his friend. Her behavior toward him is not unlike that of a pet or small child.

Analysis

The Time Machine has two main threads. The first is the adventure tale of the Eloi and Morlocks in the year 802,701 AD. The second is the science fiction of the time machine.

The adventure story includes many archetypal elements. The Time Traveller's journey to the underworld, his fear of the great forest, and his relationship to Weena, mirror imagery prevalent in earlier literature, imagery strongly associated with the inner workings of the human psyche.

The tale of 802,701 is political commentary of late Victorian England. It is a dystopia, a vision of a troubled future. It recommends that current society change its ways lest it end up like the Eloi, terrified of an underground race of Morlocks. In the Eloi, Wells satirizes Victorian decadence. In the Morlocks, Wells provides a potentially Marxist critique of capitalism.

The rest of the novella deals with the science fiction of time travel. Before Wells, other people had written fantasies of time travel, but Wells was the first to bring a strong dose of scientific speculation to the genre. Wells has his Time Traveller speak at length on the fourth dimension and on the strange astronomy and evolutionary trends he observes as he travels through time. Much of this was inspired by ideas of entropy and decay promulgated by Wells's teacher, Thomas Henry Huxley.

(taken from Sparknotes)

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

the mesmeric quack and charlatan (part two)

Falsely credited with having invented hypnotism, with which his name has become synonymous, Franz Anton Mesmer is however, a curious figure in the world of psychic practitioners.

In some ways the beliefs and practices of Mesmer look back to an earlier period of magical medicine as far back as two hundred years before his own time to the era of Paracelsus. Yet Mesmer, born in Switzerland on May 23, 1734, also directly precipitates the great surge in Spiritism that took place early in this same century of books on compact discs and Internet communications.

His principal theory is remarkable in light of recent discoveries in the realm of latter 20th century physics. Mesmer believed that a kind of psychic ether pervades all space, and that the astral bodies far and near cause tides in this fluid, or ether.

Although today's scientists certainly would not jump to such conclusions, their recent identification of something they call "dark matter", theorized after repeated calculations on the universal mass and gravitational forces proved fantastically understated when compared to mathematical projections, tend to evoke a healthy air of credibility to the theories of some of the earlier shamans, including those of the remarkable Anton Mesmer.

He believed that this ether operating in individuals, when flowing naturally, results in a normal healthy condition throughout creation. Should the natural flow of this ether be impeded in any way, all sorts of sickness result. If a blockage has occurred in a patient, it must be dislodged. In this fashion Mesmer anticipated the Christian Scientist teachings of Mary Baker Eddy a century later.

A wealthy English dame passing through Vienna where a Jesuit professor had been studying the theories of Mesmer was put to a test when she complained of severe stomach cramps. Professor Hehl laid a powerful magnet on her belly, and to her astonishment, the cramps quickly dissipated. He then suggested to Mesmer that the magnetic force quite possibly was moving the etheric fluid. The medical profession was highly skeptical, but relying on his own instincts and those of his like-minded friends, Mesmer was soon making use of magnets to effect his cures.

After bleeding a patient, which was common practice for nearly every ailment back then, Mesmer noticed that as he approached the patient the flow of blood increased, and lessened noticeably when he stepped away. This was enough to convince the forty year old lay doctor that his own body must be some sort of magnetic force, hence the term, animal magnetism.

His practice boomed when word of this new miracle cure spread, although the combined faith of both healer and the patient in the process certainly was a persuasive factor in these cures, much like the placebo effect, well documented today. That the innate powers of a charismatic personality synchronizes the strong notions of a believer to effect untold numbers of miraculous payoffs cannot be denied.

Fame was heaped upon Mesmer after a hypochondriac baron in Rokow sought his help after being sarcastically referred to him by his own physician who finally tired of his complaints of back spasms, which the doctor felt were simply a product of the idle baronÕs imagination.

After five days of failure, on the sixth day of Mesmer's magnetic treatment the baron began to feel relief from this latest writhing bout with muscle spasms. News of the cure enflamed Vienna, and the medical establishment left no doubt of their displeasure in their colleague who had helped establish this vulgar charlatan.

As his recognition grew, so did the outrageousness of his methods. Mesmer devised a simple apparatus purported to distribute the magnetic forces to whole groups of willing patients. He constructed a whole system of healing tools designed to reach the most people in the least amount of time, beginning by immersing magnets in several jars of water connected with steel bands. He then collected the jars into a wooden tub resonating with iron filings and more water, and attached a hose and nozzle to this contraption to help spray the magnetized healing about the room or garden area busy with patients lounging and holding hands by the dozens. As expected, results were astounding.

Later a blind pianist, young and attractive, was to cross his path. Mesmer promised to cure her if she would take up residence in his house so that he could concentrate his efforts. Although there is evidence that the young artist's sight malady was caused by a detached retina, she soon believed that she could see ever so dimly. His women patients invariably were outfitted in a loose smock to insure a freer transference of his magnetic powers, and it is quite likely that his technique included the hands-on kneading of their breasts, thighs, buttocks, and wherever Mesmer deemed the flesh seemed knotted unnatural concentrations of etheric fluid.

Long before Freud, Mesmer seemed to realize the effects of sexual repression and nervous hysteria. His seductive techniques released many neurotic patients to the fresh feeling of an aspiring humanity, at least temporarily, free from the bondage of the host of mental and sexual insecurities modern society encourages.

Skeptics abounded nevertheless. While he managed to "cure" many resident patients, all pretty young ladies, his elderly wife remained ailing. The young pianist is said to have actually been helped by Mesmer's attentions, but she was whisked away against her will when the Imperial Morality Police intervened. He escaped to Paris.

There, his successes continued. His sensual healing techniques became the talk of society, women and men. King Louis XVI offered the practitioner a lifetime pension if he would sign a contract to remain in Paris and furnish proofs of his discoveries. Mesmer declined both conditions and in the spirit of bargaining-table bluff, he threatened to leave France if the pension was not provided without the conditions the king wanted to impose.

His animal magnetism cures were indubitably gathering a devoted and strong-willed following. Instructing pupils in his methods, he established centers in major cities across Europe, and when the king balked at Mesmer's monetary demands, he set a date for departure.

Paris was having no part in losing this wonderful healer. His wealthy followers started a slush fund, each contributing for the privilege of being a ground floor shareholder in a new enterprise based on the magnetic healing techniques of their beloved Franz Mesmer.

Mesmer left Paris, but was persuaded to return, exhaled after the fund collected by his followers surpassed the sum which the king had originally offered. Miffed that his own will had been circumvented, the king was eventually convinced by his Medical College to investigate scientifically the claims of the Mesmerists.

Investigating doctors were convinced that no evidence of a magnetic fluid existed, although they accepted the possibility that the charlatan seemed to possess great powers of suggestion.

Shortly after, a doctor faked an illness, faked his cure, and then published the dirt on Mesmer, as the wave of favorable public opinion was beginning to wane. Leaving Paris shortly after the Revolution, fearing his life, he was promptly exiled from Vienna. He resisted an offer by the king of Prussia to establish a Mesmer Institute in Berlin, his self-confidence evaporating, his age near sixty.

Mesmer's contribution to real science can be distilled in the fact that he understood that illness is not natural. Some kind of blockage of natural forces will inevitably yield stagnation and sickness. An instinctive desire to free the vital forces from restraint kept Mesmer successful as long as his own ability to acknowledge the forces he was using was strong, but the ruling establishment, then as now more often than not, always seems to overwhelm the harbinger of fresh insight concerning the body's spiritual essence, despite the best of intentions.

Mesmer died in 1815, comfortable and somewhat vindicated. The discovery of the hypnotic state was stumbled upon by accident by one of Mesmer's disciples, the Marquis de Puysgur, one day when trying to magnetize a young shepherd boy. Rubbing the boy's head had put the lad into a hypnotic, or spasmodic sleep (as he called it). Trying to arouse the lad to consciousness, the Marquis gave several commands, such as stand up, walk, and sit down, and was astounded to observe the boy obey, yet still remain in his sleeping state. When the shepherd boy finally woke up, he had no memory of these events.

And while the story of this strange 18th century man may delight, offend, or mesmerize the reader, Franz Anton must surely appear to us as no more a quack than some of the 20th century psychologists who must trace their intellectual roots to this man whose name is now a part of our language.

[Original text here]

the mesmeric quack and charlatan (part one)

Propositions Concerning Animal Magnetism,
by Anton Mesmer, 1779
[1]

[Sir Thomas Browne complained in the middle of the 17th century that "Quacksalvers and charlatans deceive the people." [2] Quacks are still among us, but sometime in the 18th century they changed their sales pitch. Anton Mesmer was among the most famous to offer a cure that
sounded like new physical science but which leading scientists investigated and rejected. When Mesmer finally closed his elegant clinic in Paris, he was able to afford a small but comfortable estate in the country, to which he quietly retired. Potential buyers, and sellers, too, of any sort of new therapy might wish to know how he recruited so many paying clients. -dgl]

  1. A responsive influence exists between the heavenly bodies, the earth, and animated bodies.

  2. A fluid universally diffused, so continuous as not to admit of a vacuum, incomparably subtle, and naturally susceptible of receiving, propagating, and communicating all motor disturbances, is the means of this influence.

  3. This reciprocal action is subject to mechanical laws, with which we are not as yet acquainted.

  4. Alternative effects result from this action, which may be considered to be a flux and reflux.

  5. This reflux is more or less general, more or less special, more or less compound, according to the nature of the causes which determine it.

  6. It is by this action, the most universal which occurs in nature, that the exercise of active relations takes place between the heavenly bodies, the earth, and its constituent parts.

  7. The properties of matter and of organic substance depend on this action.

  8. The animal body experiences the alternative effects of this agent, and is directly affected by its insinuation into the substance of the nerves.

  9. Properties are displayed, analogous to those of the magnet, particularly in the human body, in which diverse and opposite poles are likewise to be distinguished, and these may be communicated, changed, destroyed, and reinforced. Even the phenomenon of
    declination [3] may be observed.

  10. This property of the human body which renders it susceptible of the influence of heavenly bodies, and of the reciprocal action of those which environ it, manifests its analogy with the magnet, and this has decided me to adopt the term of animal magnetism

  11. The action and virtue [4] of animal magnetism, thus characterized, may be communicated to other animate or inanimate bodies. Both of these classes of bodies, however, vary in their susceptibility.

  12. Experiments show that there is a diffusion of matter, subtle enough to penetrate all bodies without any considerable loss of energy. [5]

  13. This action and virtue may be strengthened and diffused by such bodies.

  14. Its action takes place at a remote distance, without the aid of any intermediary substance.

  15. It is, like light, increased and reflected by mirrors.

  16. It is communicated, propagated, and increased by sound.

  17. This magnetic virtue may be accumulated, concentrated, and transported.

  18. I have said that animated bodies are not all equally susceptible; in a few instances they have such an opposite property that their presence is enough to destroy all the effects of magnetism upon other bodies.

  19. This opposite virtue likewise penetrates all bodies: it also may be communicated, propagated, accumulated, concentrated, and transported, reflected by mirrors, and propagated by sound. This does not merely constitute a negative, but a positive opposite virtue.

  20. The magnet, whether natural or artificial, is like other bodies susceptible of animal magnetism, and even of the opposite virtue: in neither case does its action on fire and the needle [of a compass] suffer any change, and this shows that the principle of animal magnetism essentially differs from that of mineral magnetism.

  21. This system sheds new light upon the nature of fire and of light, as well as on the theory of attraction, of flux and reflux, of the magnet and of electricity.

  22. It teaches us that the magnet and artificial electricity have, with respect to diseases, properties common to a host of other agents presented to us by nature, and that if the use of these has been attended by some useful results, they are due to animal magnetism.

  23. These facts show, in accordance with the practical rules I am about to establish, that this principle will cure nervous diseases directly, and other diseases indirectly.

  24. By its aid the physician is enlightened as to the use of medicine, and may render its action more perfect, and can provoke and direct salutary crises, [6] so as to completely control them.

  25. In communicating my method, I shall, by a new theory of matter, demonstrate the universal utility of the principle I seek to establish.

  26. Possessed of this knowledge, the physician may judge with certainty of the origin, nature, and progress of diseases, however complicated they may be; he may hinder their development and accomplish their cure without exposing the patient to dangerous and
    troublesome consequences, irrespective of age, temperament, and sex. Even women in a state of pregnancy, and during parturition, may reap the same advantage.[7]

  27. This doctrine will finally enable the physician to decide upon the health of every individual, and of the presence of the diseases to which he may be exposed. In this way the art of healing may be brought to absolute perfection.

Footnotes:

[1] Mesmer's Propositions are included in Binet, A. & Féré, C. (1888) Animal Magnetism. New York: Appleton and Co. Alfred Binet for a time believed that he, too, could obtain amazing Mesmeric effects, then realized that he and his subjects were deluding each other. To his credit, he published an account of his error.

[2] Quacks and charlatans: see Brewer, E. C. (1870/1975) Brewer's dictionary of phrase and fable. Centenary edition revised by Ivor H. Evans. London: Cassell & Company.

[3] Declination: The needle of a compass points toward the north magnetic pole declining slightly downward through the bulge of the round earth.

[4] Virtue: The word here means "special power" or "power for good."

[5] Subtle matter: There are, in fact, particles rather like this called neutrinos. Furthermore, radiation is used to treat cancer. Some people, therefore, are still impressed by claims that some sort of "universal" rays or
particles can be "accumulated" to produce curative effects (cf. Wilhelm Reich's "orgone energy" -- http://www.orgonomicscience.org/ -- accessed 11/26/1999).

[6] Crisis: Medical practitioners believed that some diseases rose to a crisis point after which "the fever broke" and the patients recovered, unless the crisis had killed them. Under some conditions, it was thought safest to bring on the crisis early.

[7] Women: The authorities in Paris had complaints that many young single women attended Mesmer's clinic. It was generally suspected there was some sort of sexual attraction in what went on there. The Government investigation was probably more motivated by moral concerns than by an appetite for scientific accuracy.

[Original text here]

riverdale kool-aid party

do you remember the time when the net was all about file-sharing, cooking recipe and dirty jokes? i'm talking about the time before the www became such a big thing. that was some time between the period when dinosaurs still walked the earth and our own google-eats-up-everyone-else world. ftps and gophers were the places where the denizens of the dark dwelled. we exchange jokes about each other's grandmothers and discussed long-standing blueprints on how to create global anarchy. everything could be accessed, shared and twisted beyond belief - from the chemical compositions of dog-spit to your wildest, most imaginative sexual fetishes.

for those of you still new to all this, or those who were born abnormally late (so to speak), here's a quick tour of the riverdale of netizens. our tour guides then were named after those never-do-well, obnoxious, all-american teenagers archie, jughead and veronica:

archie is a search engine designed to index ftp archives, allowing people to find specific files. the earliest versions of archie simply contacted a list of ftp archives on a regular basis (contacting each roughly once a month, so as not to waste too much resources on the remote servers) and requested a listing. these listings were stored in local files to be searched using the unix grep command. later, more efficient front- and back-ends were developed, and the system spread from a local tool, to a network-wide resource, to a popular service available from multiple sites around the internet. such archie servers could be accessed in multiple ways: using a local client (such as archie or xarchie); telneting to a server directly; sending queries by electronic mail; and later via World Wide Web interfaces.

the name derives from the word "archive", but is also associated with the comic book series of the same name. it is not clear whether this was originally intended, but it certainly acted as the inspiration for the names of jughead (jonzy’s universal gopher hierarch excavation and display) and veronica (very easy rodent oriented net-wide index to computerized archives), both search systems for the gopher protocol, named after other characters from the same comics.

i've always found it funny that archie, jughead and veronica took up full-time jobs away from their fictional riverdale into cyberspace and acted as tour-guides for immaterial porn, sadistic torture, mama's favourite recipes and how-to-make-a-bomb tutorials!

the intolerant gospel

The Early Christian message announces that God has brought to pass a new epoch. It began with the coming of his son into this world, culminated provisionally in the latter's resurrection from the dead, and was supposed to reach its fulfillment in his imminent Second Coming. The Gospel--its literal translation is "Good News"--has Jesus Christ as its center. The salvation or eternal damnation of individual human beings depends on whether they believe or do not believe in him. "Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved. But whoever does not believe will be condemned"-this is the clear message of the risen Jesus at the end of Mark's Gospel, the first of the four canonical accounts to be written.

But soon, the Good News developed into Threatening News-that is, if the offer of salvation was turned down! Church leaders soon equated right belief with obedience. They projected onto the screen of heaven a social fabric based on subordination and increasingly shaped by a culture of suppression. The canonical status of the New Testament writings--henceforth an eternal norm for the church--has radically blurred the vision of its followers, inhibiting their ability to recognize that all these texts emerged from controversies whose marks they still show.

The Christian church benefited from the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans in 70 c.e., and until the end of the first century it spread rapidly within the Roman Empire. Indeed, so rapid was its continued growth that a little more than two and a half centuries later this new and formerly outlawed faith became the official religion of the empire. Judaism laid the groundwork for Christianity's enormous success by endowing the church with the high ethical standards of the Old Testament. What an irony of history that the Christian religion showed so little gratitude to her Jewish mother as to relegate her along with other "enemies" of the Gospel to the realm of darkness. Yet in so doing, she did no more than certify her inheritance, for the legacy of Israel included the doctrine of election and with it the exclusive monotheism that judged all other kinds of worship as service to idols.

As an integral part of their missionary efforts, these enthusiastic Christians introduced First Commandment intolerance ("I am Yahweh, your God, you shall have no other gods besides me") into the Greco-Roman world. Oddly enough, it was their own religious tolerance and inclusiveness that afforded the competing Hellenistic religions little chance of asserting themselves against the Christians. Acquiescence, far from being an antidote against the Christian claim of exclusive revelation, allowed the church to take advantage of Rome's laissez-faire politics in religious matters and thus to expand relentlessly.

In this context, it is worth noting that the generally exaggerated accounts of Roman persecutions of Christians were limited in scope and severity. Lusting after martyrdom, many Christians in effect condemned themselves, and many a Roman governor failed to do them the favor of execution. And once they had begun participating in the political power structure, Christian bishops guided the governmental sword against pagans, heretics, and Jews to an extent that far exceeded the intensity of previous persecutions against their coreligionists. This intolerance remained in force until modern times.

Contrary to the popular thesis that Luther's understanding of freedom included tolerance, there can be no doubt about the great reformer's intolerance toward Catholics, Jews, Turks, Gentiles, and Protestant heretics. Rather, humanists and Christian minorities first raised the call for tolerance. And despite the initial lack of success these groups achieved, they finally succeeded against the will of both the Roman and Reformed churches. To be sure, the church's resistance against tolerance was, historically speaking, a necessity. For the overall thrust of Holy Scripture, both the Old and New Testaments, is to promote God and his reign and to silence all dissenting voices.

And while "peace" is a central theme in Holy Scripture, the aggressive side of Christian faith is all but certainly responsible for the many bloody wars started in and from Christian Europe. A key issue, of course, is how that peace is to be achieved. Here, the New Testament message is as crystal-clear as it is-at least by modern standards-indefensible: Jesus Christ himself will return to carry out God's will and by force, empowered by the authority of his resurrection, will establish his father's kingdom of peace on earth. On the basis of this promise, believers in Jesus Christ have at all times claimed access to that power and used it with a good conscience against those they perceive to be enemies of the Gospel.

Indeed, intolerance seems to an inherent, even necessary ingredient of the Christian religion. The noted theologian Karl Barth says it quite openly:

No sentence is more dangerous or revolutionary than that God is One and there is no other like Him. Let this sentence be uttered in such a way that it is heard and grasped, and at once 450 prophets of Baal are always in fear of their lives. There is no more room now for what the recent past called toleration. Beside God there are only his creatures or false gods, and beside faith in him there are religions only as religions of superstition, error, and finally irreligion.
Clearly, it would be misleading to think that freedom in general and freedom of religion specifically are the consequence of the Christian message. Indeed, the religious tradition that claims as its founder the Prince of Peace has through the centuries shown an inability to endure other religious viewpoints. And this is as true today as ever, despite the protestations of church leaders who would like to have it appear otherwise in order to retain their welcome within the institutions of power that comprise the secular state.

In reality, neither Christian theology nor the church can champion freedom of religion without betraying a considerable degree of hypocrisy. For tolerance requires an unconditional acknowledgment of the freedom and dignity of human beings without recourse to God. Yet the jealous Yahweh of the Bible, who demands unconditional obedience, can never approve of such liberal affirmations.

[Gerd Luedemann is Professor of History and Literature of Early Christianity at the University of Goettingen, Germany and the director of the Institute of Early Christian Studies. The university has placed restrictions on his teaching due to his work in religious criticism. The above piece was sent to me also by the pltypian sage from the land of sin.]

gnosticism and the rise of early christianity

Introduction

Early Christianity did not develop along a single track. Alongside the catholic church of the second century, from which the New Testament ultimately derives, there were Christian groups whose literature has been preserved only in scraps, because of the concerted efforts of Christian bishops to obliterate it. Among these groups were those called Gnostics, who were branded heretics, suppressed and exterminated.

The term “Gnosticism” refers to a religious current that reached a climax in late antiquity. The Greek word gnôsis means “knowledge.” For the Gnostic, knowledge is primarily self-knowledge: the human soul is of heavenly origin. The world, like all material phenomena, faulty or even corrupt; it came into being as the result of a false step by a divine power. Each of us consists of a divine soul imprisoned in a material body and therefore we have forgotten our true homeland. By the call of the Savior, whom Christian Gnostics identified with Jesus, the soul awakens from its sleep and its drunkenness. It is instructed about its origin and its fall. This knowledge brings salvation by reuniting it with the fullness, the heavenly world, from which it comes.

A Gnostic programmatic formula runs like this: “Who were we? Into what have we been thrown? Whither are we hastening? From what are we saved? What is birth? What is rebirth?” (Excerpta ex Theodoto 78.2). The Gnostic attempt to find an answer to these questions did not involve abstract intellectual exercises or theoretical systems. Rather, in unsurpassed religious creativity they depicted the history of the human self, which in the Gnostic texts is often identified with the human soul or with a spark of light. Thus narrative myths with powerful imagery became the means by which Gnosticism was expressed.

Elements from Judaism, from Greek religion and philosophy, from Near Eastern thought and Iranian religion found their way into these myths. Anything that could provide a plausible explanation of the origin and situation of human beings in the world and their return to their origin found a place in the Gnostic belief system.

Understandably, therefore, Gnosticism is not a uniform current. While the question of the true identity of human beings is common to all Gnostic groups, the particular elaboration of the Gnostic myth differs.

Gnosticism is not limited to Christianity. Jewish, Iranian, Egyptian, and philosophical variations are reflected in existing texts. But my reflections will be limited to the rise of Christian Gnosticism and its relationship to the rise of early Christianity. The first section sketches the main differences between Catholic and Gnostic Christianity, while the second traces the trajectory from the creed of Jesus’ resurrection to Christian Gnostic faith.

The main differences between catholic and Gnostic Christianity

Let me say at the outset that catholic or proto-orthodox Christianity arose around 80 CE. The time before that date belongs to the prehistory of Christianity, when doctrines and definitions of faith were fluid, and nobody was excluded from the church for incorrect belief. It was a time of enthusiasm and ardent expectation of the Second Coming of Jesus, and believers did not pay much attention to matters of doctrinal purity. Even issues like the full humanity of Jesus or his fleshly coming to this world and his physical resurrection – which created disputes between Gnostic and catholic Christians in the second century – had no place in Christianity before 80 CE. Take Paul as an example: He denied that flesh and blood will inherit the kingdom of God and in describing Jesus’ nature said that he had taken on the form of a human being. Furthermore, he spoke of Satan as being the God of this world and thus left room for the Gnostic distinction between a creator God and a saving God.

Resistance against Gnostic tendencies came from Christian leaders of the third generation and beyond. Witnessing the dramatic growth of Christianity, they wanted to give the new religion a uniform faith and organization. Hand in hand with this they felt compelled to demonstrate that their faith was not only reasonable but involved no disloyalty to the government. This was consistent with what Paul had already written about the government having been instituted by God. Further, Christian apologists like the author of Luke-Acts, an admirer of Paul, wanted to emphasize that Christianity was not the product of some exotic corner of the world, but represented an integral part of Roman culture and the Roman Empire, and was thus a public matter. For that reason Christians bishops needed a transparent organization and a clear definition of faith, the more so since the one God whom Christians worshiped was both creator and lord of the whole world. These theologians soon equated “correct” belief with obedience, projecting onto the screen of heaven a social fabric based on subordination, and at least amenable to cultural suppression of dissent.

There are two major theological differences between Gnostic and orthodox thought.

First. Gnostics distinguished between the creator god of the Old Testament and the redeemer god while orthodox Christians identified both. Among the Gnostic Christians, the redeemer and the members of the human fellowship who profess him (“those who know”) were seen as more powerful than any of the pseudo-gods or heroes of the Bible – figures who deserve nothing but scorn. Indeed, Gnostic initiates even surpassed the highest God of the Bible, who was variously called Jaldabaoth, Samael, or Archigenitor. That deity was guilty of arrogance and blindness, and thus, of course, unable to compete with the Father of the All to whom the Gnostics give praise. Conversely, such scripturally accursed persons as the Sodomites receive all the more honor. In New Testament texts we encounter allusions to this side of Gnosticism in such words as “blaspheme,” “godlessness,” “denial,” “only god,” and “unique god.”

Second. While the orthodox Christian Jesus died a bloody death on the cross the Gnostic redeemer – who bears more than one name – has remained undiscovered by the forces of darkness and has not really died. This negative feature had the paradoxical effect of giving the redeemer and his knowing flock additional strength, for henceforth they are no longer subject, but rather superior to the rule of the creator god and his heavenly entourage, and so are able to destroy the hostile powers. Moreover, having spiritually distanced themselves from the material aspects of creation, the Gnostics abstain from certain foods and in many cases from procreation in order to overcome any tendency toward physical regeneration that might redound to the benefit of the creator god.

From the creed of Jesus’ resurrection to Christian Gnostic faith

After 2000 years of orthodox Christianity, it may seem strange to hear that the Christian Gnostics had much in common with Earliest Christianity as modern scholarship has reconstructed it. In particular, the visionary nature of Gnostic spirituality recalls the Easter enthusiasm of the first Christians, which derived from visions not of the fleshly Jesus, but of the spiritual Lord. Therefore one may say that the same logic of the resurrection creed of the earliest Christians led to both Gnostic faith and orthodox belief. Newly discovered Gnostic writings from Nag Hammadi allow us to better understand that faith. I begin with the Gnostic understanding of resurrection:

Those who say that the Lord died first and (then) rose up are in error, for he rose up first and (then) died. If one does not first attain the resurrection, that person will die. [Gospel of Philip, Logion 21]
The author first criticizes the orthodox dogma of death and resurrection of Jesus as an error and reverses its sequence. It is through knowledge that the Christian Gnostics become what they are, for the resurrection has already happened here and now. Whoever does not know this will suffer spiritual death.

According to the Christian Gnostic viewpoint, resurrection is the transition to a new being:

What, then, is the resurrection? It is always the disclosure of those who have risen. For if you remember reading in the Gospel that Elijah appeared and Moses with him, do not think the resurrection is an illusion. It is no illusion, but it is truth! Indeed, it is more fitting to say the world is an illusion, rather than the resurrection which has come into being through our Lord the Savior, Jesus Christ.

But what am I telling you now? Those who are living shall die. How do they live in an illusion? The rich have become poor, and the kings have been overthrown. Everything is prone to change. The world is an illusion! – lest, indeed, I rail at things to excess!

But the resurrection does not have this aforesaid character, for it is the truth which stands firm. It is the revelation of what is, and the transformation of things, and a transition into newness. For imperishability descends upon the perishable; the light flows down upon the darkness, swallowing it up. [Letter to Rheginos 48]
The author opposes two realms to one another: the world, which is subject to eternal change, and the realm of immutability. The world is an illusion for it changes constantly and thus is unable to remain stable. The resurrection, the truth, and the new Being, however, are stable, unchanging, and eternal; and for that reason they cannot be illusions.

Many Gnostic writings regard resurrection as the person’s return to his or her true self. In it Christians receive themselves as they were at the beginning. Thus resurrection becomes the realization of an ultimate reality. It is enacted through knowledge of what a person was from the beginning. Whoever wants to know the real meaning of resurrection must therefore move from the mere name to the real existence it represents. One Gnostic text says it thus:

Names given to the worldly are very deceptive, for they divert our thoughts from what is correct to what is incorrect. Thus one who hears the word “God” does not perceive what is real, but perceives what is unreal. So also with “the Father” and “the Son” and “the Holy Spirit” and “life” and “light” and “resurrection” and “the Church (Ekklesia)” and all the rest – people do not perceive what is real but they perceive what is unreal, unless they have come to know what is real. The names which are heard are in the world and deceive. [Gospel of Philip, Logion 11]
Another passage from the same writing expresses the discovery of one’s self and of truth in the following way:

It is not possible to see anything of the things that actually exist unless one becomes like them. This is not the way with human beings in the world: they see the sun without being a sun; and they see the heaven and the earth and all other things, but they are not these things. This is quite in keeping with the truth. But you saw something of that place, and you became those things. You saw the Spirit, you became spirit. You saw Christ, you became Christ. You saw the Father, you shall become Father. So in this place you see everything and do not see yourself, but in that place you do see yourself – and what you see you shall become. [Gospel of Philip, Logion 44]
What kind of people stand behind these and like texts that so powerfully stress the experience of faith and describe resurrection as a return to one’s origin? At various places they call themselves the immovable race. Their faith, which they consider identical with knowledge, aims at a total fulfillment of life, and is shaped by the realization of their own potential. Indeed, as a consequence of its devotion to knowledge, Gnostic faith is inspired by a divine power. Compare this witness from another Gnostic text:

My soul went slack, and I fled and was very disturbed. And I turned to myself and saw the light that surrounded me and the Good that was in me, I became divine. [Allogenes 52]
Henceforth Gnostics are open to new experiences that they previously had tried to thwart. Yet, they are able to do so only because they have learned to distinguish between what is stable and what is unstable – for the latter only deceives people. Gnostics discover this deception in all things related to creation and this world, which they see as the work of an arrogant creator god. Yet, Gnostics have learned to recognize who he really is and thereby have become stronger than he. By knowing their real origin they surpass any god.

Therefore, if people have knowledge, they are from above. If they are called, they hear, they answer, and they turn to him who is calling them, and ascend to him. And they know in what manner they are called. Having knowledge, they do the will of the one who called them, they wish to be pleasing to him, they receive rest. … They who have knowledge in this manner know where they come from and where they are going. They know as people who, having become drunk, have turned away from drunkenness, (and) having returned to themselves, have set right what are their own. [Gospel of Truth 22]
This text impressively shows the rediscovery of the subconscious self, which is identical with the divine from above. Thus self-knowledge leads to a strengthening of one’s self. This was thought to be possible because, having regained a clear vision previously lost due to drunkenness, the Gnostic believer finally woke up. On this compare another Gnostic text:

For they who have not known themselves have known nothing, but they who have known themselves have at the same time already achieved knowledge about the depth of the all. So then, you, my brother Thomas, have beheld what is obscure to people, that is, what they ignorantly stumble against. [Book of Thomas the Contender 138]
To repeat, the Gnostics are called “the ones who know themselves” (ibid.). Their way of living is described by another Gnostic scripture:

No one knows the God of truth except solely the people who will forsake all of their things of the world, having renounced the whole place of the world. … They have set themselves up as a power; they have subdued desire in every way within themselves. … They began to keep silent within themselves until the day when they should become worthy to be received above. They reject for themselves loquacity and disputations, and they endure the whole place; and they bear up under them, and they endure all of the evil things. And they are patient with every one; they make themselves equal to every one, and they also separate themselves from them. …

They bore witness to the truth [...] the power, and they went into Imperishability, the place whence they came forth, having left the world, which resembles the night, and those in it who cause the stars to revolve. This, therefore, is the true testimony: When people come to know themselves and God, who is over the truth, they will be saved, and they will crown themselves with the crown unfading. [Testimony of Truth 41–45]
One may give the following headline to this text: “How people become themselves and attain maturity.” Yet, this process of self-discovery can be successful only if one develops an inner calm and patience. Then the process will move by itself. This self-discovery is rewarding, for it presents human beings an imperishable crown, that is illumination granting them imperishability and access to a divine power.

This gain of additional power as a consequence of self-knowledge and its ecstatic character is the topic of one of the sayings of “Jesus” in the Gospel of Thomas:

Those who seek should not stop seeking until they find. When they find, they will be disturbed. When they are disturbed, they will marvel, and will reign over all. [Logion 2]
As the last text let me quote another saying of “Jesus” from the same gospel that stresses the identity of knowledge of God and of oneself.

If your leaders say to you, “Look, the (Father’s) kingdom is in the sky,” then the birds of the sky will precede you. If they say to you, “It is in the sea,” then the fish will precede you. Rather, the (Father’s) kingdom is within you and it is outside you. When you know yourselves, then you will be known, and you will understand that you are children of the living Father. But if you do not know yourselves, then you live in poverty, and you are the poverty. [Logion 3]
These original Gnostic texts that we have surveyed derive from people who focused their thought on the powers inherent in spiritually awakened human beings. These Gnostics avoid a dualism of God and human beings and use mythic and mystic language to express processes of the inner self. Since self-knowledge is the way to healing and to salvation, traditional Christian statements about Jesus’ death as atonement for our sins, the judgment at the end of time, and the church as the ordained institution of salvation are rejected. These Gnostic texts prepare the way for the insight that in the religion of the future – if indeed religion has a future – the focus must be on human beings and the spiritual powers that devolve to them as Children of the Light.

[I'm thankful to the pltypian sage for directing my attention to Gerd Lüdemann in his most recent epistle. The original text for the above entry can be found here.]

the description of a new world, called the blazing world

Margaret Cavendish was a writer notorious for a number of reasons, very few of them positive. The nickname that her contemporaries bestowed upon her was "Mad Meg", owing to certain peculiarities in her personality and means of expressing herself. She was the first woman ever to be invited to attend a meeting of the Royal Society of London, the members and methods of which she despised. (Her distaste for them was matched only by their distaste for her.) The flights of fancy that she wrote were very likely only endured by people who surrounded her because of her high social standing. Today she's viewed as a woman far ahead of her time, but during her time, she was a curiosity at best and a frustrating nuisance at worst.

The Description of a New World, Called the Blazing World (hereafter referred to for brevity's sake as The Blazing World) is one such (arguably tedious) flight of fancy, originally published alongside Cavendish's Observations Upon Experimental Philosophy. The latter work detailed her view on the way that science ought to be practiced, and involved a scathing criticism of Robert Hooke's Micrographia and experimental natural philosophy in general. That was nothing out of the ordinary, and nothing that hadn't been done before; but The Blazing World is comparatively fascinating because of the form that it takes—that of a science fiction novel, well before that genre was established and hundreds of years before the term was even coined.

Of course, when it was published it wasn't seen as revolutionary so much as it was passed over as simply another example of Cavendish's incorrigible strangeness. (And it is undeniably strange.) But its strangeness makes it an interesting relic of its time: as Cavendish was a woman writer when there were not very many woman writers, it can be taken as an example of the female perspective frustrated by a society that seeks to stifle its expression attempting to make itself heard. It also demonstrates a curious dilemma common to much early modern fiction—the distinction between fiction and fact; in the novel, Cavendish herself appears as a character, with all her real-life peculiarities, in a highly fictionalised setting. (In the novel, however, the criticism that the real-life Cavendish endured is glossed over, and her nobility exaggerated.) Most importantly for its genre, The Blazing World satirised the scientific practices of its day, in the guise of fiction, and in the name of changing opinions (or at least making existing opinions more scornful). Jonathan Swift's Gulliver's Travels is a better example of this technique employed to greater effect, but The Blazing World was its precursor.

The satirical-scientific element of The Blazing World is what I'll be focusing on here, though first it will involve a digression into what exactly was going on in the scientific community in the seventeenth century.

The emergence of early modern science fiction (anachronistically speaking) was roughly contemporaneous with the advent of new approaches to natural philosophy, and new technology to go with them. Experimentalism came into vogue with the written work of Francis Bacon, to some extent replacing the wholly theoretical approach of earlier science with empirical data and experimental demonstrations of theories; in accordance with the new emphasis on data collection, new instruments were developed to measure and observe phenomena with greater precision and in greater detail. (It could also be said that the influence worked in the opposite direction as well—better technology led to deeper investigations of phenomena after it became possible to observe them). The invention of the telescope allowed for observation of far-off celestial phenomena, and the subsequent invention of the microscope using similar optical principles made it possible for scientists to observe miniscule things.

But not everyone felt that such experimentalism or empiricism had a place at all in scientific practices, which had, in the view of some, been progressing quite well enough based on theory alone, and had been doing so for thousands of years. For some anti-experimentalist writers of science fiction, the new science and technology simultaneously presented ends to use imaginatively—discovering new worlds in the cosmos seen with telescopes, and so far unexamined tiny 'worlds' seen through microscopes—and an experimental means to rebel against. Nowhere is this reaction more evident than in The Blazing World.

The philosophical reasoning behind experimentalism in scientific practices is perhaps most clearly articulated by Francis Bacon in the preface to his New Organon, published in 1620 (some forty-six years prior to the publication of The Blazing World):

Those who have taken upon them to lay down the law of nature as a thing already searched out and understood, whether they have spoken in simple assurance or professional affectation, have therein done philosophy and the sciences great injury. For as they have been successful in inducing belief, so they have been effective in quenching and stopping enquiry; and have done more harm by spoiling and putting an end to other men's efforts than good by their own. (Organon, 143)

That is, Bacon felt that to practice science with dogmatic, pre-determined theories in mind—rather than tentative theories that could be altered when new evidence demonstrated that they were incorrect—inhibited real understanding. This is a not-so-subtle jab at natural philosophy prior to Bacon, which was nothing if not dogmatic. For instance, a large part of Aristotelian natural philosophy revolved around distinguishing between sublunary (terrestrial) and superlunary (celestial) objects and dealing with them separately, as though each behaved differently from the other by its very nature (where its nature was tied up inextricably with its position in the heavens). There was little experimental proof to corroborate the conclusions that were drawn from Aristotelian cosmological principles (e.g. that the stars were embedded in a series of concentric crystalline spheres); instead, conclusions were drawn from reason alone (clearly the stars are embedded in something, or else they would not remain in their correct places in the sky), and were accepted as indisputable by natural philosophers for centuries.

For Bacon, this was unacceptable: in his view, blindly following the traditions of one's field instead of questioning them "serves rather to fix and give stability to the errors which have their foundations in commonly received notions than to help the search after truth. So it does more harm than good" (Aphorisms, 145). Similarly, practicing science with an eye to the existence of certain unequivocal truths at the bottom of everything, waiting to be uncovered, is just as unproductive as considering "the law of nature as a thing already searched out and understood": "[a]s the sciences which we now have do not help us in finding out new works, so neither does the logic which we now have help us in finding out new sciences" (Aphorisms, 145).

To that end, new scientific methods were as necessary as the new scientific philosophy outlined above. Bacon concedes that just as reason alone is inadequate to understanding nature, so too is the unaided eye or hand inadequate to observing nature in any meaningful detail. Since "[n]either the naked hand nor the understanding left to itself can effect much", Bacon says that "[i]t is by instruments and helps that the work is done, which are as much wanted for the understanding as for the hand" (Aphorisms, 144). Where "instruments of the mind"—presumably scientific methods designed to avoid the dogmatism that plagued earlier natural philosophy—"supply either suggestions for the understanding or for cautions", the "instruments of the hand either give motion or guide it" (Aphorisms, 144-5). These "instruments of the hand" are the new technologies that were being developed and honed even as Bacon was writing, undoubtedly the most important (or at least prominent) of which were the telescope and the microscope.

This instrumental aspect of Bacon's approach to natural philosophy was appropriated, applied to microscopy, and put into practice by Hooke in his Micrographia. In Hooke's writing, there is a great deal of emphasis on the microscope as a tool for ameliorating the naked eye, not for replacing it as an observational tool. (It is a very apologetic approach that seems to pander specifically to those who would be inclined to be suspicious of the new technology, about whom more presently.) Hooke identifies two causes for "infirmities of the Senses" that do not allow for us to observe everything that nature has to offer: it is "either from the disproportion of the object to the Organ, whereby an infinite number of things can never enter into them, or else from error in the Perception, that many things, which come within their reach, are not received in a right manner" (Micrographia, 151). That is, things are either too small or too large to be seen clearly or at all with the naked eye (these are the things that can be observed through microscopes and telescopes), or things that the human eye is simply not equipped to observe (for instance, that white light is comprised of the entire spectrum of colours). Hooke also makes mention of the apparent fact that human senses are "in many particulars much outdone by those of other Creatures" (e.g., a hawk can apprehend the movement of its prey from hundreds of feet away, where such a movement would not be discernable to the human eye); this points nips in the bud a potential counter-argument that things our senses are unable to pick up are things that ought not be sensed at all.

The cure for these sensory deficiencies, following after Baconian experimental natural philosophy, is to use instruments to make up for them. Writes Hooke,

The next care to be taken, in respect of the Senses, is a supplying of their infirmities with Instruments, and, as it were, the adding of artificial Organs to the natural; this in one of them has been of late years accomplisht with prodigious benefit to all sorts of useful knowledge, by the invention of Optical Glasses. By the means of Telescopes, there is nothing so far distant but may be represented to our view; and by the help of Microscopes, there is nothing so small, as to escape our inquiry; hence there is a new visible World discovered to the understanding. [...] By this the Earth it self, which lyes so neer us, under our feet, shews quite a new thing to us, and in every little particle of its matter, we now behold almost as great a variety of Creatures, as we were able before to reckon up in the whole Universe it self. (Micrographia, 151)

This point—where there are no dogmatic prevailing scientific theories to follow, where reason alone as a means toward scientific insight is overshadowed by the importance of experiment and empirical data gleaned therefrom, and where human senses are improved by mechanical instruments to the extent that they can apprehend things that they could not have without aid—is where the critique of scientific practices and theories presented by Margaret Cavendish in The Blazing World begins. There is no doubt that Cavendish's writing is deeply indebted to the very things that it attacks—speculation on worlds other than our own was not a possibility under Aristotelian cosmology, for instance, which system was supplanted by the heliocentric universe only after the invention of the telescope allowed deeper investigation into the cosmos than had previously been possible. The Blazing World does not present criticism of technology (specifically the microscope and telescope) itself—as it had led to some discoveries not entirely without value—but rather a satirical critique of the theories and methods associated with it.

The critique is very pointed and even more thinly-veiled, presented as it is in the guise of fiction. (All the same, it is clear that Cavendish's main target is the Royal Society of London, the prevailing scientific organisation of her day and location.) In the Blazing World, natural philosophy is practiced by the Bear-men, whose exact physical nature is mysterious but whose temperaments are eminently suitable for science (which, as we will see, means that they tend toward arguing about everything without ever reaching a consensus). The stage for the critique is set when the Empress, wishing to have pressing scientific problems resolved, asks her natural philosophers to use their equipment to observe phenomena for what they really are:

[T]o avoid hereafter tedious disputes, and have the truth of the Phænomena's of Celestial bodies more exactly known, [the Empress] commanded the Bear-men, which were her Experimental Philosophers, to observe them through such instruments as are called Telescopes, which they did according to her Majesties Command; but these Telescopes caused more differences and divisions amongst them, then ever they had before; for some said, they perceived that the Sun stood still, and the Earth did move about it; others were of opinion, that they both did move; and others said again, that the Earth stood still, and the Sun did move... (Blazing World, 169)

The problems being addressed by the Bear-men put the critique that is to follow into context, where the Blazing World serves as a sort of Bizarro early modern Europe: the Aristotelian position was that the Sun moved about the Earth (geocentrism), where the Copernican position that superseded it was that the Earth in fact moved about the Sun (heliocentrism); the intermediary position held by some Ptolemaic natural philosophers was that both Earth and Sun moved through space. Clearly, according to Baconian natural philosophy, if reason created such conundra, experimental science and its accompanying technology could help to solve them, particularly as the technology to observe the heavens in detail existed in early modern telescopes. The same technology exists in the Blazing World (unsurprisingly), and the Empress feels that it ought to be used to resolve the debates that are delaying scientific progress:

After they had thus argued, the Emperess began to grow angry at their Telescopes, that they could give no better Intelligence; for, said she, now I do plainly perceive, that your Glasses are false Informers, and instead of discovering the Truth, delude your senses; Wherefore I Command you to break them, and let the Bird-men trust onely to their natural eyes, and examine Celestial objects by the motions of their own sense and reason. (Blazing World, 170)

This is a direct assault on Hooke's insistence that technology makes up for sensory deficiencies. (Hooke was writing about microscopes specifically, but the same could be said for the telescope.) That could well be the case, but does it really tell us anything useful? The thrust of Cavendish's satire is that it does not; telescopes allow the Bear-men to see the cosmos in greater detail than with the naked eye, but the details do not provide solutions for any of the problems that the Bear-men set out to solve. The implication here, evidently, is that the same thing goes for the scientists that were contemporaries of Cavendish—their telescopes didn't solve any problems, either. And if technology gets its users nowhere, perhaps they would be better off using the observational tools that nature gave them—the naked eye and naked hand.

The Bear-men offer a cursory defence of telescopes and their use by claiming "[t]hat it was not the fault of their Glasses, which caused such differences in their opinions, but the sensitive motions in their optick organs did not move alike, nor were their rational judgments always regular"—blaming their own deficiencies instead of their equipment (Blazing World, 170). The Empress answers:

That if their glasses were true informers, they would rectifie their irregular sense and reason; But, said she, Nature has made your sense and reason more regular then Art has your Glasses, for they are meer deluders, and will never lead you to the knowledg of Truth ... for you may observe the progressive motions of Celestial bodies with your natural eyes better then through Artificial Glasses. (Blazing World, 170)

In other words, any "infirmities of the Senses" that would limit the understanding of phenomena that can be gleaned from observing them cannot be compensated for by artificial means. (Perhaps the greater implication here is that such infirmities are magnified by telescopes, just as telescopes magnify the objects under observation.) The Bear-men are eventually forced into admitting that they "take more delight in Artificial delusions, then in natural truths", and that their goal is to propagate falsehood so that they might continue to indulge in the "pleasure ... of confuting and contradicting each other" (Blazing World, 170). Cavendish attacks microscopy in a similar way: the Bear-men are able to observe things through their microscopes that are invisible to the naked eye, like the thousands of "small Pearls or Hemispheres" arranged on the heads of flies, but their microscopes do not tell them what it really is that they are observing—it shows only that there are hemispheres, not what it is that they do (Blazing World, 171-2). Applied to the early modern European scientists toward whom this satire was directed, it is a damaging implication and scathing criticism indeed.

None of Cavendish's criticisms of telescopy and microscopy in The Blazing World are satirical without purpose, however; and the criticism is not levelled so much at the technology itself, but rather at the people who use it. (This is made evident when the Empress allows the Bear-men to keep their telescopes instead of having them destroyed.) Instead of a wholesale condemnation of technology, The Blazing World can be read as a warning to scientists not to let intuition and reason fall by the wayside, assuming that Baconian experimentalism in science is the only way forward. Experimentation that is not tempered by reason directed toward solving problems—much like the Bear-men's scientific practices—is just as fruitless as the blind following of established scientific paradigms that Bacon and the other experimentalists were rebelling against in the first place.

[Original Text Available Here]

tango with kali

i first discovered the blazing world and the mysteries of the ether in 2003. it happened around the time that the magus was initiated into the local chapter of the hellfire club, lost his virginity and discovered the revitalising qualities of dog-spit. during our many all-night encounters, playing noble savages in the electric forests of cyberspace, we stumbled upon the eerie utopianism of the blazing world. the grandmaster of the blazing world was a long-bearded musician who spoke of changing shapes in the astral plane and how the internet is the culmination of a millenia of planning wrought by the "powers and principalities" in the high-places of the ethereal plane.

the magus, being more ingenous than i was, started reading books by that techno-wizard nikola tesla and his more-famous follower marconi. around that time, the magus was haunted by a lady of the skyways who leaked dog-spit out of her mouth with every breath. one night, the two of us were huddled together in a weird warehouse that some believed was actually the scene of a grisly murder years ago. the hairs on the back of my neck stood upright the entire night. we were on the second floor. in the morning, the magus explained to me that many chickens were slaughtered over the years on the first floor. i never dared go back there. that night, we discussed the grail knights, the 1800 toll-free number, the "white noise" phenomenon and the sensual savagery of kali/inanna.

somewhere in the back of my mind, marshall mcluhan sounds his warning from the 1970s - "schizophrenia may be a necessary consequence of literacy". there we were in that chicken-slaughterhouse. the magus was more worried about that sensuous siren with dog-spit. i was haunted by the multitude of books that i'd read about serpentine civilisations, invasion of the body snatchers, the insidious occult imageries in modern technology, big-brother conspiracies and... well, the smell of chicken corpses was overwhelming my abilities to think straight. we were like prospero and caliban - three guesses which one i was. we were on the shores of the dreaming, trapped in a dark room illuminated only by a fluorescent lightbulb hanging from the ceiling.

all through the night, we tried to keep the voices out of our heads. voices that could only come from the ether. one of the disembodied voices spoke these words: "ethers were invented for the planets to swim in, to constitute electric atmospheres and magnetic effluvia, to convey sensations from one part of our bodies to another, and so on, until all space had been filled three or four times over with ethers...." those lines made little sense to me. it probably reminded me of some lines from the popular tom strong comic book that was published around that time.

in time, we would both leave that room with the endless poltergeist activities and return to our mundane lives. the magus continued his research by reading the works of physicist michio kaku while i wandered into cities populated by mutants and universes made up of infinite earths.

Monday, June 15, 2009

the atra-hasis effect

simon the magus from down-under mentioned very offhandedly in his latest epistle (those things are painfully rare - should have them preserved as a codex to retain their authoritativeness) about atra-hasis. the pltypian sage and i had a hard time discovering who in cronos' name atra-hasis was. i suspect that the maleficious magus actually weaved a spell over the two of us. we were down for the count. we finally got over the atra-hasis effect and emerged from it with clearer heads than when we went in. but i still have not gotten over the after-effects of the atra-hasis effect. spent the whole day mumbling atra-hasis, atra-hasis, atra-hasis, atra-hasis, atra-hasis, atra-hasis, atra-hasis....

funnily, it's kind of therapeutic. i think i'll actually use it when i undergo the torgal ritual of nanda parbat someday. after all, the atra-hasis mantra is a lot catchier than zur-en-arrh.

corpus hermeticus

magickal scrolls from the dead sea

some baptist lady sent me a mail this morning with an invitation to see the scrolls from the qumran caves. i was told that the powers-that-be are moving the hallowed writings to the land of sin. the pltypian creature from down under sent me some comments that he extracted from the book of faces to the effect of mothers vowing to take their virginal daughters to the exhibition so that they could place their lovely manicured fingers on the scrolls. word has it that the guttenberg printing machine will also be there.

in my demented infonaut imagination, this is merely further proof that the masses, the herd is forever enslaved to the techgnostic spell cast by this most alchemickal exercise called writing. we are all kabbalists now, venerating the scrolls and the printing press; and sacrificing our virginal daughters upon the altars of the written word. make no mistake about it: the textual gods demand sacrifices even more than crom, odin or zeus ever did. for while the ancient pagan storm-deities were cast in stones and wood, they soon faded into obscurity - defeated by the gods of the text. the textual gods are everlasting simply because they tapped into the higher levels of animism and transcended the merely material to become encased in the incorporeal, immaterial realms of thought. in short, they won over the battles for the unconquered frontiers of the mind. the word. the logos. that which is immaterial is far more multifaceted and richly textured than any mute statue could ever hope to emulate. for can the statues speak to us about such abstract concepts as sovereignty, predestination or divine grace? never. but such were the stock-in-trade of the illustrious writers (whom we today call mystics, evangelists, even apostles) who employed the maleficious art of writing to literally "house" the incorporeal deities and control the beliefs of a more enlightened age. gods never die. they just take on new forms to meet the needs of a new age.

the ever lovely and supremely confused simonian (also from down under) spoke about his preference for sumerian tablets over the scrolls from the dead sea. that too is another example of our dependence on this alchemickal art: writing. but i digress. in truth, i think the death of the carridianian martial artist had a far more lasting effect on his psyche (not to mention erotic impulses) than any tablets, scrolls or codices ever could. after all, more than the caged gunman, the carridianian is living proof that bangkok is indeed dangerous, much to the chagrin of the much-traveled simonian.

writing is the instrument of control as much as it is the instrument of liberation. it has been employed by the archons who seek to dominate us as much as it has by the prison-breakers who seek to transcend the merely material. we live in times wherein information has evolved to become a thing-in-itself, free from any cumbersome dependency on meaning. this is once again proven by the mothers who coerce their virginal daughters to place their little hands on the mediums of information - namely, the scrolls from the dead sea and the guttenberg bible. meaning has no place in the minds of the herd. only information. and the medium that carries information. the invention of the papyrus and the alphabet, not to mention guttenberg's infernal machine, replaced oral didache with printed logos. the delphian oracles are silenced and the distribution chains of harper-collins, nelson and zondervan are kept busy. words as manna. words as ark. words as temple to house the incorporeal gods. the herd venerate the medium though understanding little of the words. somewhere under the earth, ouroboros laughs. this is the everlasting feedback loop. nothing ever really changes. except possibly in its outering machinations.

homeric hymn to hermes


IV. TO HERMES (582 lines)

(ll. 1-29) Muse, sing of Hermes, the son of Zeus and Maia, lord of Cyllene and Arcadia rich in flocks, the luck-bringing messenger of the immortals whom Maia bare, the rich-tressed nymph, when she was joined in love with Zeus, -- a shy goddess, for she avoided the company of the blessed gods, and lived within a deep, shady cave. There the son of Cronos used to lie with the rich-tressed nymph, unseen by deathless gods and mortal men, at dead of night while sweet sleep should hold white-armed Hera fast. And when the purpose of great Zeus was fixed in heaven, she was delivered and a notable thing was come to pass. For then she bare a son, of many shifts, blandly cunning, a robber, a cattle driver, a bringer of dreams, a watcher by night, a thief at the gates, one who was soon to show forth wonderful deeds among the deathless gods. Born with the dawning, at mid-day he played on the lyre, and in the evening he stole the cattle of far-shooting Apollo on the fourth day of the month; for on that day queenly Maia bare him. So soon as he had leaped from his mother's heavenly womb, he lay not long waiting in his holy cradle, but he sprang up and sought the oxen of Apollo. But as he stepped over the threshold of the high-roofed cave, he found a tortoise there and gained endless delight. For it was Hermes who first made the tortoise a singer. The creature fell in his way at the courtyard gate, where it was feeding on the rich grass before the dwelling, waddling along. When be saw it, the luck- bringing son of Zeus laughed and said:

(ll. 30-38) `An omen of great luck for me so soon! I do not slight it. Hail, comrade of the feast, lovely in shape, sounding at the dance! With joy I meet you! Where got you that rich gaud for covering, that spangled shell -- a tortoise living in the mountains? But I will take and carry you within: you shall help me and I will do you no disgrace, though first of all you must profit me. It is better to be at home: harm may come out of doors. Living, you shall be a spell against mischievous witchcraft (13); but if you die, then you shall make sweetest song.

(ll. 39-61) Thus speaking, he took up the tortoise in both hands and went back into the house carrying his charming toy. Then he cut off its limbs and scooped out the marrow of the mountain- tortoise with a scoop of grey iron. As a swift thought darts through the heart of a man when thronging cares haunt him, or as bright glances flash from the eye, so glorious Hermes planned both thought and deed at once. He cut stalks of reed to measure and fixed them, fastening their ends across the back and through the shell of the tortoise, and then stretched ox hide all over it by his skill. Also he put in the horns and fitted a cross-piece upon the two of them, and stretched seven strings of sheep-gut. But when he had made it he proved each string in turn with the key, as he held the lovely thing. At the touch of his hand it sounded marvellously; and, as he tried it, the god sang sweet random snatches, even as youths bandy taunts at festivals. He sang of Zeus the son of Cronos and neat-shod Maia, the converse which they had before in the comradeship of love, telling all the glorious tale of his own begetting. He celebrated, too, the handmaids of the nymph, and her bright home, and the tripods all about the house, and the abundant cauldrons.

(ll. 62-67) But while he was singing of all these, his heart was bent on other matters. And he took the hollow lyre and laid it in his sacred cradle, and sprang from the sweet-smelling hall to a watch-place, pondering sheet trickery in his heart -- deeds such as knavish folk pursue in the dark night-time; for he longed to taste flesh.

(ll. 68-86) The Sun was going down beneath the earth towards Ocean with his horses and chariot when Hermes came hurrying to the shadowy mountains of Pieria, where the divine cattle of the blessed gods had their steads and grazed the pleasant, unmown meadows. Of these the Son of Maia, the sharp-eyed slayer of Argus then cut off from the herd fifty loud-lowing kine, and drove them straggling-wise across a sandy place, turning their hoof-prints aside. Also, he bethought him of a crafty ruse and reversed the marks of their hoofs, making the front behind and the hind before, while he himself walked the other way (14). Then he wove sandals with wicker-work by the sand of the sea, wonderful things, unthought of, unimagined; for he mixed together tamarisk and myrtle-twigs, fastening together an armful of their fresh, young wood, and tied them, leaves and all securely under his feet as light sandals. The brushwood the glorious Slayer of Argus plucked in Pieria as he was preparing for his journey, making shift (15) as one making haste for a long journey.

(ll. 87-89) But an old man tilling his flowering vineyard saw him as he was hurrying down the plain through grassy Onchestus. So the Son of Maia began and said to him:

(ll. 90-93) `Old man, digging about your vines with bowed shoulders, surely you shall have much wine when all these bear fruit, if you obey me and strictly remember not to have seen what you have seen, and not to have heard what you have heard, and to keep silent when nothing of your own is harmed.'

(ll. 94-114) When he had said this much, he hurried the strong cattle on together: through many shadowy mountains and echoing gorges and flowery plains glorious Hermes drove them. And now the divine night, his dark ally, was mostly passed, and dawn that sets folk to work was quickly coming on, while bright Selene, daughter of the lord Pallas, Megamedes' son, had just climbed her watch-post, when the strong Son of Zeus drove the wide-browed cattle of Phoebus Apollo to the river Alpheus. And they came unwearied to the high-roofed byres and the drinking-troughs that were before the noble meadow. Then, after he had well-fed the loud-bellowing cattle with fodder and driven them into the byre, close-packed and chewing lotus and began to seek the art of fire.

He chose a stout laurel branch and trimmed it with the knife.... ((LACUNA)) (16) ....held firmly in his hand: and the hot smoke rose up. For it was Hermes who first invented fire-sticks and fire. Next he took many dried sticks and piled them thick and plenty in a sunken trench: and flame began to glow, spreading afar the blast of fierce-burning fire.

(ll. 115-137) And while the strength of glorious Hephaestus was beginning to kindle the fire, he dragged out two lowing, horned cows close to the fire; for great strength was with him. He threw them both panting upon their backs on the ground, and rolled them on their sides, bending their necks over (17), and pierced their vital chord. Then he went on from task to task: first he cut up the rich, fatted meat, and pierced it with wooden spits, and roasted flesh and the honourable chine and the paunch full of dark blood all together. He laid them there upon the ground, and spread out the hides on a rugged rock: and so they are still there many ages afterwards, a long, long time after all this, and are continually (18). Next glad-hearted Hermes dragged the rich meats he had prepared and put them on a smooth, flat stone, and divided them into twelve portions distributed by lot, making each portion wholly honourable. Then glorious Hermes longed for the sacrificial meat, for the sweet savour wearied him, god though he was; nevertheless his proud heart was not prevailed upon to devour the flesh, although he greatly desired (19). But he put away the fat and all the flesh in the high- roofed byre, placing them high up to be a token of his youthful theft. And after that he gathered dry sticks and utterly destroyed with fire all the hoofs and all the heads.

(ll. 138-154) And when the god had duly finished all, he threw his sandals into deep-eddying Alpheus, and quenched the embers, covering the black ashes with sand, and so spent the night while Selene's soft light shone down. Then the god went straight back again at dawn to the bright crests of Cyllene, and no one met him on the long journey either of the blessed gods or mortal men, nor did any dog bark. And luck-bringing Hermes, the son of Zeus, passed edgeways through the key-hole of the hall like the autumn breeze, even as mist: straight through the cave he went and came to the rich inner chamber, walking softly, and making no noise as one might upon the floor. Then glorious Hermes went hurriedly to his cradle, wrapping his swaddling clothes about his shoulders as though he were a feeble babe, and lay playing with the covering about his knees; but at his left hand he kept close his sweet lyre.

(ll. 155-161) But the god did not pass unseen by the goddess his mother; but she said to him: `How now, you rogue! Whence come you back so at night-time, you that wear shamelessness as a garment? And now I surely believe the son of Leto will soon have you forth out of doors with unbreakable cords about your ribs, or you will live a rogue's life in the glens robbing by whiles. Go to, then; your father got you to be a great worry to mortal men and deathless gods.'

(ll. 162-181) Then Hermes answered her with crafty words: `Mother, why do you seek to frighten me like a feeble child whose heart knows few words of blame, a fearful babe that fears its mother's scolding? Nay, but I will try whatever plan is best, and so feed myself and you continually. We will not be content to remain here, as you bid, alone of all the gods unfee'd with offerings and prayers. Better to live in fellowship with the deathless gods continually, rich, wealthy, and enjoying stories of grain, than to sit always in a gloomy cave: and, as regards honour, I too will enter upon the rite that Apollo has. If my father will not give it to me, I will seek -- and I am able -- to be a prince of robbers. And if Leto's most glorious son shall seek me out, I think another and a greater loss will befall him. For I will go to Pytho to break into his great house, and will plunder therefrom splendid tripods, and cauldrons, and gold, and plenty of bright iron, and much apparel; and you shall see it if you will.'

(ll. 182-189) With such words they spoke together, the son of Zeus who holds the aegis, and the lady Maia. Now Eros the early born was rising from deep-flowing Ocean, bringing light to men, when Apollo, as he went, came to Onchestus, the lovely grove and sacred place of the loud-roaring Holder of the Earth. There he found an old man grazing his beast along the pathway from his court-yard fence, and the all-glorious Son of Leto began and said to him.

(ll. 190-200) `Old man, weeder (20) of grassy Onchestus, I am come here from Pieria seeking cattle, cows all of them, all with curving horns, from my herd. The black bull was grazing alone away from the rest, but fierce-eyed hounds followed the cows, four of them, all of one mind, like men. These were left behind, the dogs and the bull -- which is great marvel; but the cows strayed out of the soft meadow, away from the pasture when the sun was just going down. Now tell me this, old man born long ago: have you seen one passing along behind those cows?'

(ll. 201-211) Then the old man answered him and said: `My son, it is hard to tell all that one's eyes see; for many wayfarers pass to and fro this way, some bent on much evil, and some on good: it is difficult to know each one. However, I was digging about my plot of vineyard all day long until the sun went down, and I thought, good sir, but I do not know for certain, that I marked a child, whoever the child was, that followed long-horned cattle -- an infant who had a staff and kept walking from side to side: he was driving them backwards way, with their heads toward him.'

(ll. 212-218) So said the old man. And when Apollo heard this report, he went yet more quickly on his way, and presently, seeing a long-winged bird, he knew at once by that omen that thief was the child of Zeus the son of Cronos. So the lord Apollo, son of Zeus, hurried on to goodly Pylos seeking his shambling oxen, and he had his broad shoulders covered with a dark cloud. But when the Far-Shooter perceived the tracks, he cried:

(ll. 219-226) `Oh, oh! Truly this is a great marvel that my eyes behold! These are indeed the tracks of straight-horned oxen, but they are turned backwards towards the flowery meadow. But these others are not the footprints of man or woman or grey wolves or bears or lions, nor do I think they are the tracks of a rough- maned Centaur -- whoever it be that with swift feet makes such monstrous footprints; wonderful are the tracks on this side of the way, but yet more wonderfully are those on that.'

(ll. 227-234) When he had so said, the lord Apollo, the Son of Zeus hastened on and came to the forest-clad mountain of Cyllene and the deep-shadowed cave in the rock where the divine nymph brought forth the child of Zeus who is the son of Cronos. A sweet odour spread over the lovely hill, and many thin-shanked sheep were grazing on the grass. Then far-shooting Apollo himself stepped down in haste over the stone threshold into the dusky cave.

(ll. 235-253) Now when the Son of Zeus and Maia saw Apollo in a rage about his cattle, he snuggled down in his fragrant swaddling-clothes; and as wood-ash covers over the deep embers of tree-stumps, so Hermes cuddled himself up when he saw the Far- Shooter. He squeezed head and hands and feet together in a small space, like a new born child seeking sweet sleep, though in truth he was wide awake, and he kept his lyre under his armpit. But the Son of Leto was aware and failed not to perceive the beautiful mountain-nymph and her dear son, albeit a little child and swathed so craftily. He peered in ever corner of the great dwelling and, taking a bright key, he opened three closets full of nectar and lovely ambrosia. And much gold and silver was stored in them, and many garments of the nymph, some purple and some silvery white, such as are kept in the sacred houses of the blessed gods. Then, after the Son of Leto had searched out the recesses of the great house, he spake to glorious Hermes:

(ll. 254-259) `Child, lying in the cradle, make haste and tell me of my cattle, or we two will soon fall out angrily. For I will take and cast you into dusty Tartarus and awful hopeless darkness, and neither your mother nor your father shall free you or bring you up again to the light, but you will wander under the earth and be the leader amongst little folk.' (21)

(ll. 260-277) Then Hermes answered him with crafty words: `Son of Leto, what harsh words are these you have spoken? And is it cattle of the field you are come here to seek? I have not seen them: I have not heard of them: no one has told me of them. I cannot give news of them, nor win the reward for news. Am I like a cattle-liter, a stalwart person? This is no task for me: rather I care for other things: I care for sleep, and milk of my mother's breast, and wrappings round my shoulders, and warm baths. Let no one hear the cause of this dispute; for this would be a great marvel indeed among the deathless gods, that a child newly born should pass in through the forepart of the house with cattle of the field: herein you speak extravagantly. I was born yesterday, and my feet are soft and the ground beneath is rough; nevertheless, if you will have it so, I will swear a great oath by my father's head and vow that neither am I guilty myself, neither have I seen any other who stole your cows -- whatever cows may be; for I know them only by hearsay.'

(ll. 278-280) So, then, said Hermes, shooting quick glances from his eyes: and he kept raising his brows and looking this way and that, whistling long and listening to Apollo's story as to an idle tale.

(ll. 281-292) But far-working Apollo laughed softly and said to him: `O rogue, deceiver, crafty in heart, you talk so innocently that I most surely believe that you have broken into many a well- built house and stripped more than one poor wretch bare this night (22), gathering his goods together all over the house without noise. You will plague many a lonely herdsman in mountain glades, when you come on herds and thick-fleeced sheep, and have a hankering after flesh. But come now, if you would not sleep your last and latest sleep, get out of your cradle, you comrade of dark night. Surely hereafter this shall be your title amongst the deathless gods, to be called the prince of robbers continually.'

(ll. 293-300) So said Phoebus Apollo, and took the child and began to carry him. But at that moment the strong Slayer of Argus had his plan, and, while Apollo held him in his hands, sent forth an omen, a hard-worked belly-serf, a rude messenger, and sneezed directly after. And when Apollo heard it, he dropped glorious Hermes out of his hands on the ground: then sitting down before him, though he was eager to go on his way, he spoke mockingly to Hermes:

(ll. 301-303) `Fear not, little swaddling baby, son of Zeus and Maia. I shall find the strong cattle presently by these omens, and you shall lead the way.'

(ll. 304-306) When Apollo had so said, Cyllenian Hermes sprang up quickly, starting in haste. With both hands he pushed up to his ears the covering that he had wrapped about his shoulders, and said:

(ll. 307-312) `Where are you carrying me, Far-Worker, hastiest of all the gods? Is it because of your cattle that you are so angry and harass me? O dear, would that all the sort of oxen might perish; for it is not I who stole your cows, nor did I see another steal them -- whatever cows may be, and of that I have only heard report. Nay, give right and take it before Zeus, the Son of Cronos.'

(ll. 313-326) So Hermes the shepherd and Leto's glorious son kept stubbornly disputing each article of their quarrel: Apollo, speaking truly.... ((LACUNA)) ....not fairly sought to seize glorious Hermes because of the cows; but he, the Cyllenian, tried to deceive the God of the Silver Bow with tricks and cunning words. But when, though he had many wiles, he found the other had as many shifts, he began to walk across the sand, himself in front, while the Son of Zeus and Leto came behind. Soon they came, these lovely children of Zeus, to the top of fragrant Olympus, to their father, the Son of Cronos; for there were the scales of judgement set for them both.

There was an assembly on snowy Olympus, and the immortals who perish not were gathering after the hour of gold-throned Dawn.

(ll. 327-329) Then Hermes and Apollo of the Silver Bow stood at the knees of Zeus: and Zeus who thunders on high spoke to his glorious son and asked him:

(ll. 330-332) `Phoebus, whence come you driving this great spoil, a child new born that has the look of a herald? This is a weighty matter that is come before the council of the gods.'

(ll. 333-364) Then the lord, far-working Apollo, answered him: `O my father, you shall soon hear no triffling tale though you reproach me that I alone am fond of spoil. Here is a child, a burgling robber, whom I found after a long journey in the hills of Cyllene: for my part I have never seen one so pert either among the gods or all men that catch folk unawares throughout the world. He strole away my cows from their meadow and drove them off in the evening along the shore of the loud-roaring sea, making straight for Pylos. There were double tracks, and wonderful they were, such as one might marvel at, the doing of a clever sprite; for as for the cows, the dark dust kept and showed their footprints leading towards the flowery meadow; but he himself -- bewildering creature -- crossed the sandy ground outside the path, not on his feet nor yet on his hands; but, furnished with some other means he trudged his way -- wonder of wonders! -- as though one walked on slender oak-trees. Now while he followed the cattle across sandy ground, all the tracks showed quite clearly in the dust; but when he had finished the long way across the sand, presently the cows' track and his own could not be traced over the hard ground. But a mortal man noticed him as he drove the wide-browed kine straight towards Pylos. And as soon as he had shut them up quietly, and had gone home by crafty turns and twists, he lay down in his cradle in the gloom of a dim cave, as still as dark night, so that not even an eagle keenly gazing would have spied him. Much he rubbed his eyes with his hands as he prepared falsehood, and himself straightway said roundly: "I have not seen them: I have not heard of them: no man has told me of them. I could not tell you of them, nor win the reward of telling."'

(ll. 365-367) When he had so spoken, Phoebus Apollo sat down. But Hermes on his part answered and said, pointing at the Son of Cronos, the lord of all the gods:

(ll. 368-386) `Zeus, my father, indeed I will speak truth to you; for I am truthful and I cannot tell a lie. He came to our house to-day looking for his shambling cows, as the sun was newly rising. He brought no witnesses with him nor any of the blessed gods who had seen the theft, but with great violence ordered me to confess, threatening much to throw me into wide Tartarus. For he has the rich bloom of glorious youth, while I was born but yesterday -- as he too knows -- nor am I like a cattle-lifter, a sturdy fellow. Believe my tale (for you claim to be my own father), that I did not drive his cows to my house -- so may I prosper -- nor crossed the threshold: this I say truly. I reverence Helios greatly and the other gods, and you I love and him I dread. You yourself know that I am not guilty: and I will swear a great oath upon it: -- No! by these rich-decked porticoes of the gods. And some day I will punish him, strong as he is, for this pitiless inquisition; but now do you help the younger.'

(ll. 387-396) So spake the Cyllenian, the Slayer of Argus, while he kept shooting sidelong glances and kept his swaddling-clothes upon his arm, and did not cast them away. But Zeus laughed out loud to see his evil-plotting child well and cunningly denying guilt about the cattle. And he bade them both to be of one mind and search for the cattle, and guiding Hermes to lead the way and, without mischievousness of heart, to show the place where now he had hidden the strong cattle. Then the Son of Cronos bowed his head: and goodly Hermes obeyed him; for the will of Zeus who holds the aegis easily prevailed with him.

(ll. 397-404) Then the two all-glorious children of Zeus hastened both to sandy Pylos, and reached the ford of Alpheus, and came to the fields and the high-roofed byre where the beasts were cherished at night-time. Now while Hermes went to the cave in the rock and began to drive out the strong cattle, the son of Leto, looking aside, saw the cowhides on the sheer rock. And he asked glorious Hermes at once:

(ll. 405-408) `How were you able, you crafty rogue, to flay two cows, new-born and babyish as you are? For my part, I dread the strength that will be yours: there is no need you should keep growing long, Cyllenian, son of Maia!'

(ll. 409-414) So saying, Apollo twisted strong withes with his hands meaning to bind Hermes with firm bands; but the bands would not hold him, and the withes of osier fell far from him and began to grow at once from the ground beneath their feet in that very place. And intertwining with one another, they quickly grew and covered all the wild-roving cattle by the will of thievish Hermes, so that Apollo was astonished as he gazed.

(ll. 414-435) Then the strong slayer of Argus looked furtively upon the ground with eyes flashing fire.... desiring to hide.... ((LACUNA)) ....Very easily he softened the son of all-glorious Leto as he would, stern though the Far-shooter was. He took the lyre upon his left arm and tried each string in turn with the key, so that it sounded awesomely at his touch. And Phoebus Apollo laughed for joy; for the sweet throb of the marvellous music went to his heart, and a soft longing took hold on his soul as he listened. Then the son of Maia, harping sweetly upon his lyre, took courage and stood at the left hand of Phoebus Apollo; and soon, while he played shrilly on his lyre, he lifted up his voice and sang, and lovely was the sound of his voice that followed. He sang the story of the deathless gods and of the dark earth, how at the first they came to be, and how each one received his portion. First among the gods he honoured Mnemosyne, mother of the Muses, in his song; for the son of Maia was of her following. And next the goodly son of Zeus hymned the rest of the immortals according to their order in age, and told how each was born, mentioning all in order as he struck the lyre upon his arm. But Apollo was seized with a longing not to be allayed, and he opened his mouth and spoke winged words to Hermes:

(ll. 436-462) `Slayer of oxen, trickster, busy one, comrade of the feast, this song of yours is worth fifty cows, and I believe that presently we shall settle our quarrel peacefully. But come now, tell me this, resourceful son of Maia: has this marvellous thing been with you from your birth, or did some god or mortal man give it you -- a noble gift -- and teach you heavenly song? For wonderful is this new-uttered sound I hear, the like of which I vow that no man nor god dwelling on Olympus ever yet has known but you, O thievish son of Maia. What skill is this? What song for desperate cares? What way of song? For verily here are three things to hand all at once from which to choose, -- mirth, and love, and sweet sleep. And though I am a follower of the Olympian Muses who love dances and the bright path of song -- the full-toned chant and ravishing thrill of flutes -- yet I never cared for any of those feats of skill at young men's revels, as I do now for this: I am filled with wonder, O son of Zeus, at your sweet playing. But now, since you, though little, have such glorious skill, sit down, dear boy, and respect the words of your elders. For now you shall have renown among the deathless gods, you and your mother also. This I will declare to you exactly: by this shaft of cornel wood I will surely make you a leader renowned among the deathless gods, and fortunate, and will give you glorious gifts and will not deceive you from first to last.'

(ll. 463-495) Then Hermes answered him with artful words: `You question me carefully, O Far-worker; yet I am not jealous that you should enter upon my art: this day you shall know it. For I seek to be friendly with you both in thought and word. Now you well know all things in your heart, since you sit foremost among the deathless gods, O son of Zeus, and are goodly and strong. And wise Zeus loves you as all right is, and has given you splendid gifts. And they say that from the utterance of Zeus you have learned both the honours due to the gods, O Far-worker, and oracles from Zeus, even all his ordinances. Of all these I myself have already learned that you have great wealth. Now, you are free to learn whatever you please; but since, as it seems, your heart is so strongly set on playing the lyre, chant, and play upon it, and give yourself to merriment, taking this as a gift from me, and do you, my friend, bestow glory on me. Sing well with this clear-voiced companion in your hands; for you are skilled in good, well-ordered utterance. From now on bring it confidently to the rich feast and lovely dance and glorious revel, a joy by night and by day. Whoso with wit and wisdom enquires of it cunningly, him it teaches through its sound all manner of things that delight the mind, being easily played with gentle familiarities, for it abhors toilsome drudgery; but whoso in ignorance enquires of it violently, to him it chatters mere vanity and foolishness. But you are able to learn whatever you please. So then, I will give you this lyre, glorious son of Zeus, while I for my part will graze down with wild-roving cattle the pastures on hill and horse-feeding plain: so shall the cows covered by the bulls calve abundantly both males and females. And now there is no need for you, bargainer though you are, to be furiously angry.'

(ll. 496-502) When Hermes had said this, he held out the lyre: and Phoebus Apollo took it, and readily put his shining whip in Hermes' hand, and ordained him keeper of herds. The son of Maia received it joyfully, while the glorious son of Leto, the lord far-working Apollo, took the lyre upon his left arm and tried each string with the key. Awesomely it sounded at the touch of the god, while he sang sweetly to its note.

(ll. 503-512) Afterwards they two, the all-glorious sons of Zeus turned the cows back towards the sacred meadow, but themselves hastened back to snowy Olympus, delighting in the lyre. Then wise Zeus was glad and made them both friends. And Hermes loved the son of Leto continually, even as he does now, when he had given the lyre as token to the Far-shooter, who played it skilfully, holding it upon his arm. But for himself Hermes found out another cunning art and made himself the pipes whose sound is heard afar.

(ll. 513-520) Then the son of Leto said to Hermes: `Son of Maia, guide and cunning one, I fear you may steal form me the lyre and my curved bow together; for you have an office from Zeus, to establish deeds of barter amongst men throughout the fruitful earth. Now if you would only swear me the great oath of the gods, either by nodding your head, or by the potent water of Styx, you would do all that can please and ease my heart.'

(ll. 521-549) Then Maia's son nodded his head and promised that he would never steal anything of all the Far-shooter possessed, and would never go near his strong house; but Apollo, son of Leto, swore to be fellow and friend to Hermes, vowing that he would love no other among the immortals, neither god nor man sprung from Zeus, better than Hermes: and the Father sent forth an eagle in confirmation. And Apollo sware also: `Verily I will make you only to be an omen for the immortals and all alike, trusted and honoured by my heart. Moreover, I will give you a splendid staff of riches and wealth: it is of gold, with three branches, and will keep you scatheless, accomplishing every task, whether of words or deeds that are good, which I claim to know through the utterance of Zeus. But as for sooth-saying, noble, heaven-born child, of which you ask, it is not lawful for you to learn it, nor for any other of the deathless gods: only the mind of Zeus knows that. I am pledged and have vowed and sworn a strong oath that no other of the eternal gods save I should know the wise-hearted counsel of Zeus. And do not you, my brother, bearer of the golden wand, bid me tell those decrees which all- seeing Zeus intends. As for men, I will harm one and profit another, sorely perplexing the tribes of unenviable men. Whosoever shall come guided by the call and flight of birds of sure omen, that man shall have advantage through my voice, and I will not deceive him. But whoso shall trust to idly-chattering birds and shall seek to invoke my prophetic art contrary to my will, and to understand more than the eternal gods, I declare that he shall come on an idle journey; yet his gifts I would take.

(ll. 550-568) `But I will tell you another thing, Son of all- glorious Maia and Zeus who holds the aegis, luck-bringing genius of the gods. There are certain holy ones, sisters born -- three virgins (23) gifted with wings: their heads are besprinkled with white meal, and they dwell under a ridge of Parnassus. These are teachers of divination apart from me, the art which I practised while yet a boy following herds, though my father paid no heed to it. From their home they fly now here, now there, feeding on honey-comb and bringing all things to pass. And when they are inspired through eating yellow honey, they are willing to speak truth; but if they be deprived of the gods' sweet food, then they speak falsely, as they swarm in and out together. These, then, I give you; enquire of them strictly and delight your heart: and if you should teach any mortal so to do, often will he hear your response -- if he have good fortune. Take these, Son of Maia, and tend the wild roving, horned oxen and horses and patient mules.'

(ll. 568a-573) So he spake. And from heaven father Zeus himself gave confirmation to his words, and commanded that glorious Hermes should be lord over all birds of omen and grim-eyed lions, and boars with gleaming tusks, and over dogs and all flocks that the wide earth nourishes, and over all sheep; also that he only should be the appointed messenger to Hades, who, though he takes no gift, shall give him no mean prize.

(ll. 574-578) Thus the lord Apollo showed his kindness for the Son of Maia by all manner of friendship: and the Son of Cronos gave him grace besides. He consorts with all mortals and immortals: a little he profits, but continually throughout the dark night he cozens the tribes of mortal men.

(ll. 579-580) And so, farewell, Son of Zeus and Maia; but I will remember you and another song also.

XVIII. TO HERMES (12 lines)

(ll. 1-9) I sing of Cyllenian Hermes, the Slayer of Argus, lord of Cyllene and Arcadia rich in flocks, luck-bringing messenger of the deathless gods. He was born of Maia, the daughter of Atlas, when she had made with Zeus, -- a shy goddess she. Ever she avoided the throng of the blessed gods and lived in a shadowy cave, and there the Son of Cronos used to lie with the rich- tressed nymph at dead of night, while white-armed Hera lay bound in sweet sleep: and neither deathless god nor mortal man knew it.

(ll. 10-11) And so hail to you, Son of Zeus and Maia; with you I have begun: now I will turn to another song!

(l. 12) Hail, Hermes, giver of grace, guide, and giver of good things! (31)

[This translation, by Evelyn-White, is in the public domain.]

antinomian antics: sabotaging the matrix

Eighteen hundred years ago, the Christian religion was in a state of chaotic upheaval. The Bible hadn’t been canonised yet, most important doctrinal issues were still up for grabs, and nobody could agree on what Jesus’ message actually was.

One of the most exotic flavours in this seething cauldron of theological controversy was Gnosticism, a mystical philosophy whose adherents rejected the creator god of the Old Testament as an incompetent fraud.

Instead the Gnostic Christians dedicated their lives to the search for another god, an elusive deity secretly hidden within the human spirit.

This quest for the God within took many forms. Some Gnostics advocated a total rejection of the world and society, living in the desert as ascetic monks; others married, worked and played alongside their neighbours without ever discussing their spiritual pursuits.

The Gnostics had an intuitive, personal approach to enlightenment. There was no hierarchy, no code of conduct and no central governing authority; the goal was liberation by any means necessary, not the creation of new orthodoxies.

Misunderstood Mystics

While most Gnostic Christians contented themselves with respectable lives of study and contemplation, others chose a more direct route.

Often mischaracterised as “libertines” or “devil-worshippers,” it is the taboo-smashing travelers of this shorter path who have inspired the most curiosity among modern researchers.

Taboo and Transgression

Perhaps no two human activities are as thickly ringed round with religious and social taboos as the twin mysteries of sex and death – the beginning and the end, the void from which human life emerges and the gulf into which it disappears.

French philosopher Georges Bataille argues the religious impulse is identical to erotic desire for this reason – both strive for the extinction of individual consciousness, either through the mystical death of the ego (religion) or the “little death” of the orgasm (sex).

In Bataille’s view, sexual and religious taboos provoke their own violation – or “transgression” – simply by existing, for it is only through the very human drive to define and then deflower (or desecrate) states of purity that we loosen the grip of rational utility and plunge or collapse into ecstatic communion with the sacred.

Taboo-breaking, in other words, is a profoundly spiritual activity; whether through religion (the giddy euphoria of the blood sacrifice), sex (the anarchic carnality of the orgy) or social play (the topsy-turvy lawlessness of the carnival). Madmen, criminals and holy fools throughout the ages have always sought to tempt fate and “break on through to the other side.”

Antinomian Antics

The notion that the psychological shock caused by performing forbidden activities can lead to spiritual awakening is called “antinomianism”. The word “antinomian” means, literally, “against the law.”

Antinomian sects have been present throughout human history in almost every culture. Perhaps the best-known modern example is that of the Aghora (or “pure ones”), Hindu holy men who practice necrophilia, cannibalism and even coprophagy (the eating of feces) in their fierce quest for wisdom.

Of course, from the Aghora’s point of view, eating feces is simply God eating God. If everything is God, then why would he discriminate between sights, smells and tastes or prefer certain experiences, substances or actions?

But perhaps he would, for like many antinomian cults, the Aghora often speak in code. The practitioner who tells us that he eats his own feces may be speaking metaphorically of his meditative practice. Without experiencing his path for ourselves, we simply cannot know.

As the above example should make abundantly clear, the antinomian path isn’t for the casually curious, nor should it be confused with mere hedonism. It demands absolute discretion, a disdain for disapproval, and an unshakeable commitment to an ethic literally not of this world.

Beyond Good and Evil

Antinomian mystics have never been concerned with social status, physical comfort or moral redemption. Instead, their goal has always been the acquisition of divine power through mystical merger with the godhead.

What society calls evil is what violates boundaries and overflows without limit, blurring the categories between pure and impure, sacred and profane.

The antinomian heroine deliberately ignores these distinctions, performing acts that most people would see as dirty, disgusting or dangerous. Trespassing on divine territory, she frees herself from society’s taboos, dissolving shame, fear and judgment as she opens herself up to the absolute.

With every forbidden act, the soul is enlarged and strengthened, made more able to receive and integrate the divine power unleashed thereby.

Antinomianism in Primitive Christianity

The antinomian current in Gnostic Christianity came in two flavours, weak and strong.

The “weak” antinomian ideal held that since the flesh was just a temporary vehicle for the spirit, mature Christians could do whatever they pleased with their bodies. Biblical rules governing diet, behaviour, dress, sex, etc., were restrictive and unnecessary distractions intended for the mundane herd, not the spiritual elite.

The “strong” antinomian ideal was embraced by those Christian groups we would today call “Short Path”. Preaching depravity as a positive value, these urged believers to sin without restraint. Sex, fear and intoxicants were used to break down taboos and social conditioning, releasing tremendous amounts of magical energy while sanctifying the vilest deeds with a mysterious grace.

The Deep Things of Satan

The most infamous Gnostic antinomian of all was Carpocrates, a second-century teacher from the Egyptian city of Alexandria whose students prided themselves on their “knowledge of the deep things of Satan.”

According to St. Irenaeus, what made Carpocrates’ teachings so especially blasphemous was the idea Christians had to bribe the Devil in order to return to God. The Devil would guide the souls of dead through the afterworld, but only if they had already paid him in life through the ritualistic performance of a multitude of “sins.”

The Jesus Jail Break

Carpocrates taught that the Earth was a prison planet created by rebellious angels who had imprisoned human souls here in shadowy tombs of flesh and bone. These “angels” were the Rulers, botched copies of another, higher deity called the unborn god.

Jesus was a normal human being until he remembered his previous existence as a bodiless soul with the unborn god outside space and time. As Jesus grew in knowledge and spiritual clarity, he realised that laws and institutions (the 10 Commandments, for example) had been designed by the world-building Rulers to ensnare and mislead us. The best way to get over “sins” was to just give into them. Like water seeking its own level, the soul could then return to the unborn god, unencumbered by earthly limits and restrictions.

To the Carpocratians, Jesus was a model of someone who had achieved total freedom of the soul – and since the source of Jesus’ power lay in His utter contempt for the angels’ created universe, anyone could become greater than Jesus by despising “things below” even more than He had. For this reason, some Carpocratians considered themselves equal to Jesus Himself, while others considered themselves even more powerful.

The Carpocratians incorporated secret handshakes, dream interpretation, magic spells and other occult rites into Christian worship. Having defeated and risen above the creators and rulers of the world, the accomplished Carpocratian could now command these same entities, ruling over the invisible forces of creation much as they themselves ruled over the Earth.

Moral prohibitions and taboos seemed to provoke – rather than inhibit – the Carpocratians. As heresy-hunter St. Irenaeus explained:

“[The Carpocratians] have reached such a pitch of madness that they say that it is in their power to do whatever is irreligious and impious, for they say that actions are good and bad only in accordance with human opinion. In the transmigrations into bodies, souls ought to experience every kind of life and action... so that... their souls... may not, when they depart, still suffer any lack. They must act in such a way that they will not be forced into another body if something is still lacking in their freedom.”

The purpose of human life, in this view, was not to obey the rules set down by the fallen angels who built the world and stranded us here, but to achieve enlightenment and escape the sphere of illusion altogether. Laws were a sort of spiritual obstacle, designed to keep us motivated by pain and pleasure. It was this misguided tendency to construct reality in terms of opposites (for example, “right and wrong,” “good and evil,” “reward and punishment”) that kept us trapped here in the cycle of death and rebirth.

Jesus revealed how to escape from the cycle of reincarnation in the following parable:

“When you are with your adversary on the way, act so that you may be freed from him, lest he deliver you to the judge and the judge to the officer and he cast you into prison; truly I say to you, you will not come out from there until you pay the last quadrant.”
This “adversary” was the Devil, the leader of the world-creating Rulers. After death, the Devil handed the souls of the ignorant and inexperienced over to the “judge” and then to the “officer”; these angelic bureaucrats recycled unprepared souls by trapping them in new bodies and sending them back to the Earth to live again. The body was a “prison.”

“You will not come out from there until you pay the last quadrant,” meant that no one escaped from the Rulers who created the Earth; souls are always returned here until they have “completed all sins.” The soul which had completed all sins in one lifetime was freed from the cycle of reincarnation and returned to the god above the world-creating Rulers (cf. Luke 12:58); there was no other way to be saved.

Those who engaged in each and every sin at least once would not be forced to live again. Having paid their “debts” by exploring every nook and cranny of human life, they were no longer required to live in bodies.

Carpocrates claimed that Jesus revealed these secret teachings only to the disciples (Mark 4:10-11) who could understand them. Love and faith were enough to attain salvation (cf. Gal. 5:6); “good” and “bad” existed only as matters of human opinion.

Christian Cavemen

The controversy over Carpocrates didn’t end with St. Irenaeus. St. Clement accuses the mischievous mystic of stealing a copy of “The Secret Gospel of Mark” from the Church library in Alexandria and adapting it to suit his “blasphemous and carnal” teachings.

St. Clement doesn’t tell us what these teachings were, but since Carpocrates was an enthusiastic student of Platonic philosophy we can probably take an educated guess.

“Secret Mark” has Jesus spending the night in a cave showing “the Kingdom of God” to a man He raised from the dead. Similarly, Plato’s “cave” myth compares ordinary waking life to imprisonment in a dark tunnel filled with flickering shadows, a pit we can only escape with the help of philosophy.

Carpocrates probably combined the myth of “Plato’s Cave” with the teachings of “Secret Mark” and adapted them to an initiation ritual intended to lead his students to the eternal world outside the cave.

Return to the Garden of Eden

Carpocrates’ goal was to escape from the universe; his son Epiphanes sought to reform it instead. A teenage prodigy whose radical views on marriage and property have influenced generations of Christian freethinkers, Epiphanes set out his philosophy in a revolutionary essay called “On Righteousness and Justice.”

God, Epiphanes argued, has provided sunlight and plant life – indeed, the whole planet – for our common use and enjoyment. In a world of such abundance, why would theft or jealousy even exist?

These vices arose, Epiphanes concluded, when blind, ignorant men perverted God’s gifts by greedily insisting on private ownership.

Given God’s limitless generosity, why did so many Christians insist on keeping their food, animals and land locked up, not to mention their wives? By selfishly refusing to share the benefits of matrimony with their fellow believers, weren’t they spiting the same God who blessed us with strong sexual drives and desires in the first place?

Epiphanes had a novel response to the stifling traditions which had so provoked his father: When God told His chosen not to swap wives He must have been joking.

“Consequently one must understand the saying ‘You shall not desire’ as if the lawgiver [God] was making a jest, to which he added the even more comic words ‘your neighbour’s goods’ [Exodus 20:17]. For he himself who gave the desire to sustain the race orders that it is to be suppressed, though he removes it from no other animals. And by the words ‘your neighbour’s wife’ he says something even more ludicrous, since he forces what should be common property to be treated as a private possession."
Sabotaging the Matrix

Epiphanes’ subversive reading of Mosaic Law was shared by the Cainites, a mysterious second-century Christian group who took their name from Abel’s homicidal brother. The Cainites were not escapists like the Carpocratians or reformers like Epiphanes; instead we might describe them as saboteurs.

Like many other Gnostic Christian groups, the Cainites believed the Earth we inhabit was a sort of cosmic prison or zoo, a labyrinth for the souls of the fallen and the lost ruled over by an incompetent and insane Demiurge. This Demiurge was identified with Yahweh, the wrathful creator god of Genesis. His mother was Sophia, the hidden Goddess of Wisdom.

The Cainites rejected the diabolical Demiurge, looking instead to Sophia (the “superior power”) for guidance and protection. Like Yahweh, Sophia had chosen people of her own; through Cain, Judas, the Sodomites, and all of the other outcasts of the Old Testament, she worked tirelessly to undermine Yahweh’s authority.

The Cainites were “strong” antinomians who treated sinning as a religious duty. Through the systematic violation of Yahweh’s moral laws, they sought to undo the actual physical laws (e.g., gravity, friction) which make life on Earth possible.

The Cainites invoked angels while sinning for assistance, not forgiveness – in short, they were trying to sabotage the Matrix:

“And they say they cannot be saved in any other way, except they pass through all things, just as Carpocrates also said. And at every sinful and base action an angel is present and instills in him who ventures the deed audacity and impurity… And this is the perfect “knowledge,” to enter without fear into such operations, which it is not lawful even to name.”
With their audacious pursuit of unspeakable acts, the Cainites seem to have anticipated the pessimistic neo-Platonism of Jean Baudrillard, the French postmodernist whose concept of simulation has so influenced contemporary science fiction:

For example: it would be interesting to see whether the repressive apparatus would not react more violently to a simulated hold-up than to a real one? For the latter only upsets the order of things, the right of property, whereas the other… suggests, over and above its object, that law and order themselves might really be nothing more than a simulation.

In a simulated world, neither crime nor punishment can exist in any meaningful way – how could they, when victims, police and money are all just different aspects of the same illusion?

Conclusion

The antinomian legacy is wreathed in paradox. What little we know about these rebellious holy men comes only from the reports of their enemies.

What most Christians called “sins” the antinomian Gnostic called initiations – no wonder their message so horrified the establishment!

The antinomian path asks difficult questions. Can we make ourselves pure by wallowing in impurity? What is pure? What is impure? What is sin? What is not?

Does might make right? Does power corrupt? Is pleasure a crime? Do the same rules apply equally to everyone? Are some laws higher than the laws of man?

In a world where conventional morality defines civilian deaths as “collateral damage”, prejudice as a “family value”, and pregnancy as an “epidemic,” we may find ourselves agreeing with Bataille’s poignant plea for collective awakening when he writes:

“Lift the curse of those feelings which oppress men, which force them into wars they do not want, and consign them to work from whose fruits they never benefit… Assume within oneself perversion and crime, not as exclusive values, but as a prelude to their integration into the totality of humanity. Participate in the destruction of a world as it presently exists, with eyes open to the world which is yet to be."
Where nothing is true and everything is permitted, the antinomian becomes the only moralist worth listening to. Perhaps these ancient heretics still have something to teach us today after all.

[Original Article by Rev. Max]

the rebirth of ouroboros and jörmungandr


greetings.

welcome to the talmud of the cyberrealms. this is the hypertextual hades of the anarchic frontier populated by neo-carpocratians and their barbelite offsprings. this is the cry of the animistic psyche kosmou, the animated lightning that empowers all we see. atlas shrugged and the world tumbled into the toilet bowl of the archons. thus, it becomes the holy calling of the high rollers variously called imaginauts, infonauts, neuromancers or astral travelers, to fish out the stinking world once more and clean off the excrement of the archons from its surface.

hermes trismegistus and zarathustra went into a love motel and gave birth to an infernal love-child they named the internet. it was the praxis of possibilities, the crossroads of conflicting philosophies and damning heresies. it was an orgiastic celebration of the dazed and confused, a hallucinatory holocaust for the ruling archons. the authority has fallen by the side of the crossroads. it is doomed as all matter is doomed. it is the uninformed past trying to control and police the enlightened future that belongs now and forevermore to the free spirits envisioned by the holy friedrich who heralded the coming of the übermensch.

all beings so far have created something beyond themselves; and do you want to be the ebb of this great flood and even go back to the beasts rather than overcome man? what is the ape to man? a laughingstock or a painful embarrassment. and man shall be just that for the übermensch: a laughingstock or a painful embarrassment…

the prima materia of our art is the ever-repeating feedback loop, the clashing sounds produced by the cataclymic meeting of the finite and the infinite, the physical and the spiritual. in the place of an either-or dualism, i present to you the all inclusive assimilation of the both-and. this is the mandala of our alchemickal being. this is the mantra of our creation and our creating. this is the rebirth of ouroboros and jörmungandr. we are the klaxons and the deadboy detectives who venerate the elephantmen of yore. we are the insane collective of the selfish genes who wage an eternal war against the fleshly bags of excrement called bodies. we are the resurgence of the gnostic infonauts, imagineers and imaginauts in the age of the übermensch.